netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@redhat.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	davem@davemloft.net, jasowang@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com,
	dgibson@redhat.com, vfalico@gmail.com, edumazet@google.com,
	vyasevic@redhat.com, hkchu@google.com, wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	xemul@parallels.com, therbert@google.com,
	bhutchings@solarflare.com, xii@google.com,
	stephen@networkplumber.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] net: allow large number of rx queues
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 01:15:28 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1250944564.24690078.1408425328214.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53F23B4C.2000507@cogentembedded.com>


> Hello.
> 
> On 08/18/2014 05:37 PM, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> 
> > netif_alloc_rx_queues() uses kcalloc() to allocate memory
> > for "struct netdev_queue *_rx" array.
> > If we are doing large rx queue allocation kcalloc() might
> > fail, so this patch does a fallback to vzalloc().
> > Similar implementation is done for tx queue allocation in
> > netif_alloc_netdev_queues().
> 
> > We avoid failure of high order memory allocation
> > with the help of vzalloc(), this allows us to do large
> > rx and tx queue allocation which in turn helps us to
> > increase the number of queues in tun.
> 
> > As vmalloc() adds overhead on a critical network path,
> > __GFP_REPEAT flag is used with kzalloc() to do this fallback
> > only when really needed.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@redhat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: David Gibson <dgibson@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >   net/core/dev.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
> >   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> > diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> > index 1c15b18..a455a02 100644
> > --- a/net/core/dev.c
> > +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> > @@ -5942,17 +5942,24 @@ void netif_stacked_transfer_operstate(const struct
> > net_device *rootdev,
> >   EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_stacked_transfer_operstate);
> >
> >   #ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
> > +static void netif_free_rx_queues(struct net_device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	kvfree(dev->_rx);
> > +}
> > +
> >   static int netif_alloc_rx_queues(struct net_device *dev)
> >   {
> >   	unsigned int i, count = dev->num_rx_queues;
> >   	struct netdev_rx_queue *rx;
> > -
> > +	size_t sz = count * sizeof(*rx);
> 
>    Please keep an empty line after declarations.
     Yes, I will add it. Thanks
> 
> >   	BUG_ON(count < 1);
> >
> 
> WBR, Sergei
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-19  5:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-18 13:37 [RFC 0/4] Increase the limit of tuntap queues Pankaj Gupta
2014-08-18 13:37 ` [RFC 1/4] net: allow large number of rx queues Pankaj Gupta
2014-08-18 17:43   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-08-19  5:15     ` Pankaj Gupta [this message]
2014-08-18 13:37 ` [RFC 2/4] tuntap: Publish tuntap maximum number of queues as module_param Pankaj Gupta
2014-08-20 10:58   ` Jiri Pirko
2014-08-20 11:17     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-08-20 11:46       ` Jiri Pirko
2014-08-20 11:49         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-08-20 11:53           ` Jiri Pirko
2014-08-21  4:30       ` Jason Wang
2014-08-22 11:52         ` Pankaj Gupta
2014-08-24 11:14           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-08-25  2:57             ` Jason Wang
2014-08-26 15:30               ` Pankaj Gupta
2014-08-18 13:37 ` [RFC 3/4] tuntap: reduce the size of tun_struct by using flex array Pankaj Gupta
2014-08-25  1:35   ` David Gibson
2014-08-18 13:37 ` [RFC 4/4] tuntap: Increase the number of queues in tun Pankaj Gupta
2014-08-25  1:37   ` David Gibson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1250944564.24690078.1408425328214.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
    --to=pagupta@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dgibson@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hkchu@google.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=therbert@google.com \
    --cc=vfalico@gmail.com \
    --cc=vyasevic@redhat.com \
    --cc=wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=xemul@parallels.com \
    --cc=xii@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).