From: Jens Rosenboom <me@jayr.de>
To: Linux Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC] net/core: Delay neighbor only if it has been used after confirmed
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:17:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1251883079.5813.18.camel@fnki-nb00130> (raw)
When doing some IPv6 testing with the router advertising a small (e.g. 5
seconds) reachable time, I noticed that after the traffic has stopped,
hosts continue to exchange ND packets every 10 seconds. This is due to
neigh_timer_handler() only checking neigh->used and puts a neighbor into
NUD_DELAY state even if neigh->confirmed may be >= neigh->used.
The following patch for net-next-2.6 fixes this behaviour for my IPv6
setup, however I would like to hear some opinion on whether this might
have some negative influence on other protocols that use this code.
I also think that it would make more sense to compute the time for the
delay timer starting from neigh->used instead of using now (second part
of the patch).
diff --git a/net/core/neighbour.c b/net/core/neighbour.c
index 5bc4ad5..ca20162 100644
--- a/net/core/neighbour.c
+++ b/net/core/neighbour.c
@@ -820,12 +820,13 @@ static void neigh_timer_handler(unsigned long arg)
NEIGH_PRINTK2("neigh %p is still alive.\n", neigh);
next = neigh->confirmed + neigh->parms->reachable_time;
} else if (time_before_eq(now,
- neigh->used + neigh->parms->delay_probe_time)) {
+ neigh->used + neigh->parms->delay_probe_time) &&
+ time_after(neigh->confirmed, neigh->used)) {
NEIGH_PRINTK2("neigh %p is delayed.\n", neigh);
neigh->nud_state = NUD_DELAY;
neigh->updated = jiffies;
neigh_suspect(neigh);
- next = now + neigh->parms->delay_probe_time;
+ next = neigh->used + neigh->parms->delay_probe_time;
} else {
NEIGH_PRINTK2("neigh %p is suspected.\n", neigh);
neigh->nud_state = NUD_STALE;
next reply other threads:[~2009-09-02 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-02 9:17 Jens Rosenboom [this message]
2009-09-02 12:22 ` [RFC] net/core: Delay neighbor only if it has been used after confirmed YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2009-09-02 13:03 ` Jens Rosenboom
2009-09-10 16:21 ` Jens Rosenboom
2009-09-15 10:07 ` Jens Rosenboom
2009-09-15 10:13 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1251883079.5813.18.camel@fnki-nb00130 \
--to=me@jayr.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox