From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] etherdevice.h: random_ether_addr update Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:44:46 -0700 Message-ID: <1252802686.4400.19.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> References: <20090911014757.19631.66570.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20090910190703.25d14533@nehalam> <1252638163.4355.35.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20090911.121542.45333246.davem@davemloft.net> <1252700442.15292.62.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20090911141554.0072d365@nehalam> <1252717067.29420.22.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20090913094409.2dd88212@opy.nosense.org> <20090913100342.4f6a2417@opy.nosense.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Stephen Hemminger , David Miller , jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, gospo@redhat.com, gregory.v.rose@intel.com, donald.c.skidmore@intel.com To: Mark Smith Return-path: Received: from mail.perches.com ([173.55.12.10]:1127 "EHLO mail.perches.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754046AbZIMAop (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Sep 2009 20:44:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090913100342.4f6a2417@opy.nosense.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 10:03 +0930, Mark Smith wrote: > Hmm, probably didn't make my point all that clear. IOW, anything that > can contribute to avoiding duplicate mac addresses is worth it in my > opinion, when compared to the time (usually hours) involved in > troubleshooting duplicate mac addresses. Avoiding an initial octet of "02", which is partially assigned to 3Com and others, might be useful. Not drawing from entropy I think useful, but it's debatable.