From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexandre Cassen Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND 3] IPv6: 6rd tunnel mode Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:07:27 +0200 Message-ID: <1253704047.17175.48.camel@lnxos-dev> References: <20090922220251.GA22874@lnxos.staff.proxad.net> <20090923184314.a2a2701d.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Reply-To: acassen@freebox.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki Return-path: Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.2]:39011 "EHLO smtp2-g21.free.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751911AbZIWLIN (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:08:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090923184314.a2a2701d.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 18:43 +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote: > Hello. > > First of all, thank you for this work. > > On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:02:51 +0200 > Alexandre Cassen wrote: > > > This patch add support to 6rd tunnel mode as described into > > draft-despres-6rd-03. > > > > Patch history : > > * http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/26870/ > > * http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/34026/ > > * http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/34045/ > > > > IPv6 rapid deployment (draft-despres-6rd-03) builds upon mechanisms > > Well, I was confused. I think draft-softwire-ipv6-6rd > is the latest one, no? draft-despres-6rd-03 : targeting informational RFC (=> currently pending) draft-softwire-ipv6-6rd : targeting standard track after last IETF meeting previous draft-townsley-ipv6-6rd as been pushed to IETG softwires WG. So you right, ref should be set to draft-softwire-ipv6-6rd. > Another comment is that we should combine 6to4 > and 6rd. Completly agree. 6to4 is a special case of 6rd. Okay, so I stop producing (fixing according to last comments) and resending new patch for 6rd. regs, Alexandre