From: Yakov Lerner <iler.ml@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: Yakov Lerner <iler.ml@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] /proc/net/tcp, overhead removed
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 01:01:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1254178906-5293-1-git-send-email-iler.ml@gmail.com> (raw)
Take 2.
"Sharp improvement in performance of /proc/net/tcp when number of
sockets is large and hashsize is large.
O(numsock * hashsize) time becomes O(numsock + hashsize). On slow
processors, speed difference can be x100 and more."
I must say that I'm not fully satisfied with my choice of "st->sbucket"
for the new preserved index. The better name would be "st->snum".
Re-using "st->sbucket" saves 4 bytes, and keeps the patch to one sourcefile.
But "st->sbucket" has different meaning in OPENREQ and LISTEN states;
this can be confusing.
Maybe better add "snum" member to struct tcp_iter_state ?
Shall I change subject when sending "take N+1", or keep the old subject ?
Signed-off-by: Yakov Lerner <iler.ml@gmail.com>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index 7cda24b..e4c4f19 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -1994,13 +1994,14 @@ static inline int empty_bucket(struct tcp_iter_state *st)
hlist_nulls_empty(&tcp_hashinfo.ehash[st->bucket].twchain);
}
-static void *established_get_first(struct seq_file *seq)
+static void *established_get_first_after(struct seq_file *seq, int bucket)
{
struct tcp_iter_state *st = seq->private;
struct net *net = seq_file_net(seq);
void *rc = NULL;
- for (st->bucket = 0; st->bucket < tcp_hashinfo.ehash_size; ++st->bucket) {
+ for (st->bucket = bucket; st->bucket < tcp_hashinfo.ehash_size;
+ ++st->bucket) {
struct sock *sk;
struct hlist_nulls_node *node;
struct inet_timewait_sock *tw;
@@ -2010,6 +2011,8 @@ static void *established_get_first(struct seq_file *seq)
if (empty_bucket(st))
continue;
+ st->sbucket = st->num;
+
spin_lock_bh(lock);
sk_nulls_for_each(sk, node, &tcp_hashinfo.ehash[st->bucket].chain) {
if (sk->sk_family != st->family ||
@@ -2036,6 +2039,11 @@ out:
return rc;
}
+static void *established_get_first(struct seq_file *seq)
+{
+ return established_get_first_after(seq, 0);
+}
+
static void *established_get_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *cur)
{
struct sock *sk = cur;
@@ -2064,6 +2072,9 @@ get_tw:
while (++st->bucket < tcp_hashinfo.ehash_size &&
empty_bucket(st))
;
+
+ st->sbucket = st->num;
+
if (st->bucket >= tcp_hashinfo.ehash_size)
return NULL;
@@ -2107,6 +2118,7 @@ static void *tcp_get_idx(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t pos)
if (!rc) {
st->state = TCP_SEQ_STATE_ESTABLISHED;
+ st->sbucket = 0;
rc = established_get_idx(seq, pos);
}
@@ -2116,6 +2128,25 @@ static void *tcp_get_idx(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t pos)
static void *tcp_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
{
struct tcp_iter_state *st = seq->private;
+
+ if (*pos && *pos >= st->sbucket &&
+ (st->state == TCP_SEQ_STATE_ESTABLISHED ||
+ st->state == TCP_SEQ_STATE_TIME_WAIT)) {
+ void *cur;
+ int nskip;
+
+ /* for states estab and tw, st->sbucket is index (*pos) */
+ /* corresponding to the beginning of bucket st->bucket */
+
+ st->num = st->sbucket;
+ /* jump to st->bucket, then skip (*pos - st->sbucket) items */
+ st->state = TCP_SEQ_STATE_ESTABLISHED;
+ cur = established_get_first_after(seq, st->bucket);
+ for (nskip = *pos - st->num; cur && nskip > 0; --nskip)
+ cur = established_get_next(seq, cur);
+ return cur;
+ }
+
st->state = TCP_SEQ_STATE_LISTENING;
st->num = 0;
return *pos ? tcp_get_idx(seq, *pos - 1) : SEQ_START_TOKEN;
--
1.6.5.rc2
next reply other threads:[~2009-09-28 23:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-28 23:01 Yakov Lerner [this message]
2009-09-29 4:39 ` [PATCH] /proc/net/tcp, overhead removed Eric Dumazet
2009-09-29 7:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-29 8:55 ` Yakov Lerner
2009-09-29 15:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-09-29 17:34 ` Yakov Lerner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-09-26 21:31 Yakov Lerner
2009-09-27 9:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-28 22:10 ` Yakov Lerner
2009-09-28 22:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-28 23:24 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-09-29 7:43 ` Yakov Lerner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1254178906-5293-1-git-send-email-iler.ml@gmail.com \
--to=iler.ml@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).