From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: kernel mode pppoe ppp if + ifb + mirred redirect, ethernet packets in ifb?! Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:00:27 -0400 Message-ID: <1255521627.21940.1.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com> References: <200910121143.39924.denys@visp.net.lb> <200910130144.04910.denys@visp.net.lb> <1255436477.6305.2.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com> <200910131545.36946.denys@visp.net.lb> <1255438959.6305.13.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Denys Fedoryschenko Return-path: Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com ([209.85.221.172]:42916 "EHLO mail-qy0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756353AbZJNMEH (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:04:07 -0400 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so9659480qyk.21 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 05:03:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1255438959.6305.13.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 09:18 -0400, jamal wrote: > Ok - makes sense. I know some people using mark for ingress pseudo RPF. > And given instability of netfilter interface, I may just end up patching > skbedit. Ok, I just whipped a quick patch for skbedit to set the mark - and it seems to work well after some basic testing. I will post. cheers, jamal