From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: [PATCH] iputils: ping by mark Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:04:52 -0400 Message-ID: <1255820692.4815.2.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com> References: <1255381558.5406.33.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com> <7e84ed60910161405i2ce46053m9858b7f1c086e6b7@mail.gmail.com> <1255782635.11213.7.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com> <55a4f86e0910171154v460146a8m1360fac71f9ddac8@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Rob.Townley@gmail.com, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Maciej =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=BBenczykowski?= Return-path: Received: from mail-qy0-f194.google.com ([209.85.221.194]:39737 "EHLO mail-qy0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752403AbZJQXHx (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:07:53 -0400 Received: by qyk32 with SMTP id 32so2215838qyk.4 for ; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:07:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55a4f86e0910171154v460146a8m1360fac71f9ddac8@mail.gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 11:54 -0700, Maciej =C5=BBenczykowski wrote: > This patch requires the currently being suggested/reviewed/written > 'fix SO_MARK' patches, some of which have already been committed. >=20 Elucidate please. SO_MARK has been in for at least a year. This patch has worked fine in 2.6.31 and pre-31 where i tested. What patches and what are they fixing in this regard to get this working? cheers, jamal