From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Hutchings Subject: Re: [PATCH] myri10ge: improve port type reporting in ethtool output Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:03:04 +0100 Message-ID: <1255957384.2782.2.camel@achroite> References: <4ADBFA88.8030300@myri.com> <1255939929.3916.13.camel@localhost> <4ADC5CB8.4010801@myri.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Brice Goglin , "David S. Miller" , Linux Network Development list To: Andrew Gallatin Return-path: Received: from mail.solarflare.com ([216.237.3.220]:53230 "EHLO exchange.solarflare.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753952AbZJSNDD (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:03:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4ADC5CB8.4010801@myri.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 08:34 -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > Lying about link modes is not an improvement. > > OK, so we're probably doing something wrong. I suspect we're not > alone. At least we don't set SUPPORTED_TP for CX4, like I've > seen some NICs do. > > Can somebody suggest how we can tell ethtool that > the NIC supports 10Gb only (no autoneg down to 1Gb or lower) > for copper (10Gbase-CX4)? How about for fiber (10Gbase-{S,L})R? What's wrong with what you already do? Customers expect to see something on the supported line? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.