From: "Figo.zhang" <figo1802@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Silverstone <dsilvers@simtec.co.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Ben Dooks <ben@simtec.co.uk>
Subject: [PATCH V2]NET/KS8695: add support NAPI for Rx
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:23:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1256653422.2148.23.camel@myhost> (raw)
Add support NAPI Rx API for KS8695NET driver.
v2, change the Rx function to NAPI.
in <KS8695X Integrated Multi-port Gateway Solution Register Description
v1.0>:
Interrupt Enable Register (offset 0xE204)
Bit29 : WAN MAC Receive Interrupt Enable
Bit16 : LAN MAC Receive Interrupt Enable
Interrupt Status Register (Offset 0xF208)
Bit29: WAN MAC Receive Status
Bit16: LAN MAC Receive Status
see arch/arm/mach-ks8695/devices.c:
ks8695_wan_resources[] and ks8695_lan_resources[]
have IORESOURCE_IRQ , it have define the RX irq,
for wan, irq = 29; for lan ,irq = 16.
so we can do this read the interrupt status:
unsigned long mask_bit = 1 << ksp->rx_irq;
status = readl(KS8695_IRQ_VA + KS8695_INTST);
Signed-off-by: Figo.zhang <figo1802@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/arm/ks8695net.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/arm/ks8695net.c b/drivers/net/arm/ks8695net.c
index 2a7b774..ed0b0f3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/arm/ks8695net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/arm/ks8695net.c
@@ -35,12 +35,15 @@
#include <mach/regs-switch.h>
#include <mach/regs-misc.h>
+#include <asm/mach/irq.h>
+#include <mach/regs-irq.h>
#include "ks8695net.h"
#define MODULENAME "ks8695_ether"
#define MODULEVERSION "1.01"
+
/*
* Transmit and device reset timeout, default 5 seconds.
*/
@@ -152,6 +155,8 @@ struct ks8695_priv {
enum ks8695_dtype dtype;
void __iomem *io_regs;
+ struct napi_struct napi;
+
const char *rx_irq_name, *tx_irq_name, *link_irq_name;
int rx_irq, tx_irq, link_irq;
@@ -172,6 +177,7 @@ struct ks8695_priv {
dma_addr_t rx_ring_dma;
struct ks8695_skbuff rx_buffers[MAX_RX_DESC];
int next_rx_desc_read;
+ spinlock_t rx_lock;
int msg_enable;
};
@@ -396,25 +402,53 @@ ks8695_tx_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
* @irq: The IRQ which went off (ignored)
* @dev_id: The net_device for the interrupt
*
- * Process the RX ring, passing any received packets up to the
- * host. If we received anything other than errors, we then
- * refill the ring.
+ * Use NAPI to receive packets.
*/
+
static irqreturn_t
ks8695_rx_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
struct net_device *ndev = (struct net_device *)dev_id;
struct ks8695_priv *ksp = netdev_priv(ndev);
+ unsigned long status;
+
+ unsigned long mask_bit = 1 << ksp->rx_irq;
+
+ spin_lock(&ksp->rx_lock);
+
+ status = readl(KS8695_IRQ_VA + KS8695_INTST);
+
+ /*clean rx status bit*/
+ writel(status | mask_bit , KS8695_IRQ_VA + KS8695_INTST);
+
+ if (status & mask_bit) {
+ if (napi_schedule_prep(&ksp->napi)) {
+ /*disable rx interrupt*/
+ status &= ~mask_bit;
+ writel(status , KS8695_IRQ_VA + KS8695_INTEN);
+ __napi_schedule(&ksp->napi);
+ }
+ }
+
+ spin_unlock(&ksp->rx_lock);
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static int ks8695_rx(struct net_device *ndev, int budget)
+{
+ struct ks8695_priv *ksp = netdev_priv(ndev);
struct sk_buff *skb;
int buff_n;
u32 flags;
int pktlen;
int last_rx_processed = -1;
+ int received = 0;
buff_n = ksp->next_rx_desc_read;
- do {
- if (ksp->rx_buffers[buff_n].skb &&
- !(ksp->rx_ring[buff_n].status & cpu_to_le32(RDES_OWN))) {
+ while (received < budget
+ && ksp->rx_buffers[buff_n].skb
+ && (!(ksp->rx_ring[buff_n].status &
+ cpu_to_le32(RDES_OWN)))) {
rmb();
flags = le32_to_cpu(ksp->rx_ring[buff_n].status);
/* Found an SKB which we own, this means we
@@ -464,7 +498,7 @@ ks8695_rx_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
/* Relinquish the SKB to the network layer */
skb_put(skb, pktlen);
skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, ndev);
- netif_rx(skb);
+ netif_receive_skb(skb);
/* Record stats */
ndev->stats.rx_packets++;
@@ -478,29 +512,44 @@ rx_failure:
/* Give the ring entry back to the hardware */
ksp->rx_ring[buff_n].status = cpu_to_le32(RDES_OWN);
rx_finished:
+ received++;
/* And note this as processed so we can start
* from here next time
*/
last_rx_processed = buff_n;
- } else {
- /* Ran out of things to process, stop now */
- break;
- }
- buff_n = (buff_n + 1) & MAX_RX_DESC_MASK;
- } while (buff_n != ksp->next_rx_desc_read);
-
- /* And note which RX descriptor we last did anything with */
- if (likely(last_rx_processed != -1))
- ksp->next_rx_desc_read =
- (last_rx_processed + 1) & MAX_RX_DESC_MASK;
-
- /* And refill the buffers */
- ks8695_refill_rxbuffers(ksp);
-
- /* Kick the RX DMA engine, in case it became suspended */
- ks8695_writereg(ksp, KS8695_DRSC, 0);
+ buff_n = (buff_n + 1) & MAX_RX_DESC_MASK;
+ /*And note which RX descriptor we last did */
+ if (likely(last_rx_processed != -1))
+ ksp->next_rx_desc_read =
+ (last_rx_processed + 1) &
+ MAX_RX_DESC_MASK;
+
+ /* And refill the buffers */
+ ks8695_refill_rxbuffers(ksp);
+ }
+ return received;
+}
- return IRQ_HANDLED;
+static int ks8695_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
+{
+ struct ks8695_priv *ksp = container_of(napi, struct ks8695_priv, napi);
+ struct net_device *dev = ksp->ndev;
+ unsigned long mask_bit = 1 << ksp->rx_irq;
+ unsigned long isr = readl(KS8695_IRQ_VA + KS8695_INTEN);
+
+ unsigned long work_done ;
+
+ work_done = ks8695_rx(dev, budget);
+
+ if (work_done < budget) {
+ unsigned long flags;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&ksp->rx_lock, flags);
+ /*enable rx interrupt*/
+ writel(isr | mask_bit, KS8695_IRQ_VA + KS8695_INTEN);
+ __napi_complete(napi);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ksp->rx_lock, flags);
+ }
+ return work_done;
}
/**
@@ -1472,6 +1521,8 @@ ks8695_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
SET_ETHTOOL_OPS(ndev, &ks8695_ethtool_ops);
ndev->watchdog_timeo = msecs_to_jiffies(watchdog);
+ netif_napi_add(ndev, &ksp->napi, ks8695_poll, 64);
+
/* Retrieve the default MAC addr from the chip. */
/* The bootloader should have left it in there for us. */
@@ -1505,6 +1556,7 @@ ks8695_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
/* And initialise the queue's lock */
spin_lock_init(&ksp->txq_lock);
+ spin_lock_init(&ksp->rx_lock);
/* Specify the RX DMA ring buffer */
ksp->rx_ring = ksp->ring_base + TX_RING_DMA_SIZE;
@@ -1626,6 +1678,7 @@ ks8695_drv_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct ks8695_priv *ksp = netdev_priv(ndev);
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
+ netif_napi_del(&ksp->napi);
unregister_netdev(ndev);
ks8695_release_device(ksp);
next reply other threads:[~2009-10-27 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-27 14:23 Figo.zhang [this message]
2009-10-28 10:55 ` [PATCH V2]NET/KS8695: add support NAPI for Rx David Miller
2009-10-28 10:57 ` Ben Dooks
2009-10-28 12:06 ` Daniel Silverstone
2009-10-28 12:14 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1256653422.2148.23.camel@myhost \
--to=figo1802@gmail.com \
--cc=ben@simtec.co.uk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsilvers@simtec.co.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).