From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com
Subject: [PATCH net-2.6] sfc: Set ip_summed correctly for page buffers passed to GRO
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:50:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1256655057.2794.4.camel@achroite> (raw)
Page buffers containing packets with an incorrect checksum or using a
protocol not handled by hardware checksum offload were previously not
passed to LRO. The conversion to GRO changed this, but did not set
the ip_summed value accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
---
This affects 2.6.31 and seems like a candidate for a stable update.
Ben.
drivers/net/sfc/rx.c | 9 ++++++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/rx.c b/drivers/net/sfc/rx.c
index ea59ed2..4b65c62 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/rx.c
@@ -441,7 +441,8 @@ static void efx_rx_packet__check_len(struct efx_rx_queue *rx_queue,
* the appropriate LRO method
*/
static void efx_rx_packet_lro(struct efx_channel *channel,
- struct efx_rx_buffer *rx_buf)
+ struct efx_rx_buffer *rx_buf,
+ bool checksummed)
{
struct napi_struct *napi = &channel->napi_str;
@@ -463,7 +464,8 @@ static void efx_rx_packet_lro(struct efx_channel *channel,
skb->len = rx_buf->len;
skb->data_len = rx_buf->len;
skb->truesize += rx_buf->len;
- skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
+ skb->ip_summed =
+ checksummed ? CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY : CHECKSUM_NONE;
napi_gro_frags(napi);
@@ -472,6 +474,7 @@ out:
rx_buf->page = NULL;
} else {
EFX_BUG_ON_PARANOID(!rx_buf->skb);
+ EFX_BUG_ON_PARANOID(!checksummed);
napi_gro_receive(napi, rx_buf->skb);
rx_buf->skb = NULL;
@@ -567,7 +570,7 @@ void __efx_rx_packet(struct efx_channel *channel,
}
if (likely(checksummed || rx_buf->page)) {
- efx_rx_packet_lro(channel, rx_buf);
+ efx_rx_packet_lro(channel, rx_buf, checksummed);
goto done;
}
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
next reply other threads:[~2009-10-27 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-27 14:50 Ben Hutchings [this message]
2009-10-27 19:44 ` [PATCH net-2.6] sfc: Really allow RX checksum offload to be disabled Ben Hutchings
2009-10-28 9:49 ` David Miller
2009-10-28 10:53 ` Ben Hutchings
2009-10-28 10:44 ` [PATCH net-2.6] sfc: Set ip_summed correctly for page buffers passed to GRO David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1256655057.2794.4.camel@achroite \
--to=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).