From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Hutchings Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] gro: Name the GRO result enumeration type Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:48:18 +0000 Message-ID: <1256903298.3136.261.camel@localhost> References: <1256840061.2827.80.camel@achroite> <1256840775.2827.83.camel@achroite> <20091029.213223.94736944.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from exchange.solarflare.com ([216.237.3.220]:20118 "EHLO exchange.solarflare.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756671AbZJ3LsR (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:48:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20091029.213223.94736944.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 21:32 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Ben Hutchings > Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:26:15 +0000 > > > This clarifies which return and parameter types are GRO result codes > > and not RX result codes. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings > > --- > > This replaces the previous patch 1/4 and avoids introducing compiler > > warnings. The original patches 2-4 will still apply on top of it. > > You can't do this Ben. > > Changing this patch makes the follow-on patches not apply cleanly. [...] I'm sorry about that - a git rebase succeeded without manual attention, so I believed they did. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.