netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jdb@comx.dk>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Hackers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Robert Olsson <robert@herjulf.net>
Subject: Strange CPU load when flushing route cache (kernel 2.6.31.6)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:58:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1258970332.29747.262.camel@jdb-workstation> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1255 bytes --]

Hi Eric and netdev,

I have observed a strange route cache behaviour when I upgraded some
of my production Linux routers (1Gbit/s tg3) to kernel 2.6.31.6 (from
kernel 2.6.25.7).

Every time the route cache is flushed I get a CPU spike (in softirq)
with a tail.  I have attached some graphs that illustrate the issue
(hope vger.kernel.org will allow these attachments...)


I have done some tuning of the route cache:

 # From /etc/sysctl.conf
 #
 # Adjusting the route cache flush interval
 net/ipv4/route/secret_interval = 1200

 # Limiting the route cache size
 # ip_dst_cache slab objects is 256 bytes.
 # 2000000 * 256 bytes = 512 MB
 net/ipv4/route/max_size = 2000000

Boot parameters: "rhash_entries=262143 vmalloc=256M"

The rhash_entries is for the route cache hash size.  The vmalloc is
needed because I have _very_ large iptables rulesets (and is running
on a 32-bit kernel, due to old hardware).

Any thoughs on how to avoid these CPU spikes?
Or where the issue occurs in the code?

-- 
Med venlig hilsen / Best regards
  Jesper Brouer
  ComX Networks A/S
  Linux Network Kernel Developer
  Cand. Scient Datalog / MSc.CS
  Author of http://adsl-optimizer.dk
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer

[-- Attachment #2: CPU_usage.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 16710 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: CPU_usage_softirq.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 15344 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #4: PPS_eth1-rx.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 10930 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #5: route_cache.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 17499 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #6: softnet_time_squeeze.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 15145 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2009-11-23 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-23  9:58 Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2009-11-23 10:29 ` Strange CPU load when flushing route cache (kernel 2.6.31.6) Eric Dumazet
2009-11-23 12:28   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-11-23 13:25     ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-23 13:48       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-11-23 14:03         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-26 10:51           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-11-26 11:05             ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-23 15:07 ` robert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1258970332.29747.262.camel@jdb-workstation \
    --to=jdb@comx.dk \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robert@herjulf.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).