From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH] irq: Add node_affinity CPU masks for smarter irqbalance hints Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:18:52 +0100 Message-ID: <1259147932.4027.327.camel@laptop> References: <20091123064630.7385.30498.stgit@ppwaskie-hc2.jf.intel.com> <2674af740911222332i65c0d066h79bf2c1ca1d5e4f0@mail.gmail.com> <1258968980.2697.9.camel@ppwaskie-mobl2> <1258995923.4531.715.camel@laptop> <1259051902.4531.1053.camel@laptop> <1259053156.2631.21.camel@ppwaskie-mobl2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr , Yong Zhang , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "arjan@linux.jf.intel.com" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Jesse Barnes To: Thomas Gleixner Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:45927 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752371AbZKYLSw (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:18:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: While we're dicking about with irq affinities, maybe we ought to consider cpuset integration as well. There's various folks who want to use exclusive cpusets to isolate workloads.