From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jdb@comx.dk>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@diku.dk>,
Linux Kernel Network Hackers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Robert Olsson <robert@herjulf.net>
Subject: Re: Strange CPU load when flushing route cache (kernel 2.6.31.6)
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:51:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1259232716.30983.101.camel@jdb-workstation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B0A9631.2030705@gmail.com>
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 15:03 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > grep LowTotal /proc/meminfo
> > LowTotal: 747080 kB
> >
> > What does that mean? Is it bad? What should I run on a 32-bit
> > system/kernel?
>
> If you have more than 1GB of physical ram, and use your machine as a router, you might
> compile a 2GB/2GB User/Kernel kernel, to get twice available RAM for kernel
> and more IP route entries (if needed)
Can I still use this option if the machine "only" have 2G of physical
RAM? Most of my production machines have 2G RAM.
Just to verify: This is not an issue on 64-bit kernels right?
> make menuconfig
> --> Processor type and features
> --> Memory split
> --> 2G/2G
For completeness sake, Memory split depends on "if EMBEDDED"
So I also needed to enable:
make menuconfig
--> General setup
--> Configure standard kernel features (for small systems)
> > Can you recommend any other /proc/sys/ tuning options?
>
> Really hard to say without exact context of use :)
The machines does Internet traffic routing, but with a VERY large
iptables rulesets, e.g. on one production machine I have 18409 chains
and 62916 iptables rules. (I did most of the scalability patches to
iptables userspace to make this work...). And the machines also uses a
very large HTB tree. Basically I do, per customer, Access Control,
Bandwidth limiting and Personal firewall.
Also note that I'm reserving extra vmalloc memory as iptables uses
vmalloc'ed memory...
> > Does my kernel boot option rhash_entries=262143 make sense anymore?
> > Or do we adjust the hash bucket size dynamically these days?
> >
>
> Its not dynamic yet.
Okay I'll keep boot parameter then... or is it possible to resize the
hash runtime?
--
Med venlig hilsen / Best regards
Jesper Brouer
ComX Networks A/S
Linux Network Kernel Developer
Cand. Scient Datalog / MSc.CS
Author of http://adsl-optimizer.dk
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-26 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-23 9:58 Strange CPU load when flushing route cache (kernel 2.6.31.6) Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-11-23 10:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-23 12:28 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-11-23 13:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-23 13:48 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-11-23 14:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-26 10:51 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2009-11-26 11:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-23 15:07 ` robert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1259232716.30983.101.camel@jdb-workstation \
--to=jdb@comx.dk \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hawk@diku.dk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robert@herjulf.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).