From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: Avoid WARN_ON for PHY_NOLINK during resuming
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 13:12:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <125eddc1-8791-e8c4-39ac-fb5b864d91ba@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86262217-a620-dc5b-cf5a-3a23ea869834@socionext.com>
On 21.10.2022 11:35, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
> Hi Heiner,
>
> Thank you for your comment.
>
> On 2022/10/21 17:38, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> On 21.10.2022 09:41, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
>>> When resuming from sleep, if there is a time lag from link-down to link-up
>>> due to auto-negotiation, the phy status has been still PHY_NOLINK, so
>>> WARN_ON dump occurs in mdio_bus_phy_resume(). For example, UniPhier AVE
>>> ethernet takes about a few seconds to link up after resuming.
>>>
>> That autoneg takes some time is normal. If this would actually the root
>> cause then basically every driver should be affected. But it's not.
>
> Although the auto-neg should happen normally, I'm not sure about other
> platforms.
>
>>> To avoid this issue, should remove PHY_NOLINK the WARN_ON conditions.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 8 ++++----
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
>>> index 57849ac0384e..c647d027bb5d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
>>> @@ -318,12 +318,12 @@ static __maybe_unused int mdio_bus_phy_resume(struct
>>> device *dev)
>>> phydev->suspended_by_mdio_bus = 0;
>>>
>>> /* If we managed to get here with the PHY state machine in a state
>>> - * neither PHY_HALTED, PHY_READY nor PHY_UP, this is an indication
>>> - * that something went wrong and we should most likely be using
>>> - * MAC managed PM, but we are not.
>>> + * neither PHY_HALTED, PHY_READY, PHY_UP nor PHY_NOLINK, this is an
>>> + * indication that something went wrong and we should most likely
>>> + * be using MAC managed PM, but we are not.
>>> */
>>
>> Did you read the comment you're changing? ave_resume() calls phy_resume(),
>> so you should follow the advice in the comment.
>
> I understand something is wrong with "PHY_NOLINK" here, and need to investigate
> the root cause of the phy state issue.
>
Best look at how phydev->mac_managed_pm is used in phylib and by MAC drivers.
> Thank you,
>
> ---
> Best Regards
> Kunihiko Hayashi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-21 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-21 7:41 [PATCH net] net: phy: Avoid WARN_ON for PHY_NOLINK during resuming Kunihiko Hayashi
2022-10-21 8:38 ` Heiner Kallweit
2022-10-21 9:35 ` Kunihiko Hayashi
2022-10-21 11:12 ` Heiner Kallweit [this message]
2022-10-21 11:27 ` Kunihiko Hayashi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=125eddc1-8791-e8c4-39ac-fb5b864d91ba@gmail.com \
--to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).