* Compilation issues using netlink.h
@ 2009-12-28 0:32 Matthew Burgess
2010-01-05 2:32 ` Ben Hutchings
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Burgess @ 2009-12-28 0:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: davem, ben, linux-kernel
Hi,
The test case below simplifies a failure I see when trying to compile
strace using kernel headers from Linux-2.6.32.2:
#include <linux/netlink.h>
struct sockaddr_nl nl;
int main() {
return 0;
}
$ gcc -o test test.c
In file included from test.c:1:
/usr/include/linux/netlink.h:34: error: expected
specifier-qualifier-list before 'sa_family_t'
The comment in netlink.h suggests that 'sa_family_t' is expected to be
found in linux/socket.h, but since commit 9c501935a3 ("net: Support
inclusion of <linux/socket.h> before <sys/socket.h>") that appears to
not be true anymore, it's now in sys/socket.h. Sure enough, if I change
the include in netlink.h to pull in sys/socket.h instead of
linux/socket.h, that enables the test case (and strace) to compile
again, but I wasn't sure if it was really the right thing to do.
Thanks,
Matt.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Compilation issues using netlink.h
2009-12-28 0:32 Compilation issues using netlink.h Matthew Burgess
@ 2010-01-05 2:32 ` Ben Hutchings
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ben Hutchings @ 2010-01-05 2:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthew Burgess; +Cc: netdev, davem, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1629 bytes --]
On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 00:32 +0000, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The test case below simplifies a failure I see when trying to compile
> strace using kernel headers from Linux-2.6.32.2:
>
> #include <linux/netlink.h>
> struct sockaddr_nl nl;
> int main() {
> return 0;
> }
>
> $ gcc -o test test.c
> In file included from test.c:1:
> /usr/include/linux/netlink.h:34: error: expected
> specifier-qualifier-list before 'sa_family_t'
>
> The comment in netlink.h suggests that 'sa_family_t' is expected to be
> found in linux/socket.h, but since commit 9c501935a3 ("net: Support
> inclusion of <linux/socket.h> before <sys/socket.h>") that appears to
> not be true anymore, it's now in sys/socket.h.
Right. I'm aware of this and suggested that it should be reverted, but
David Miller reckons I was right in the first place.
> Sure enough, if I change
> the include in netlink.h to pull in sys/socket.h instead of
> linux/socket.h, that enables the test case (and strace) to compile
> again, but I wasn't sure if it was really the right thing to do.
I don't think it is - that will bring in many more definitions.
There are actually a whole lot of kernel networking headers which
require sa_family_t when included by user-space code. Until
<linux/socket.h> and <sys/socket.h> cooperate to define sa_family_t
once, you will just have to include <sys/socket.h> before kernel
networking headers.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
The obvious mathematical breakthrough [to break modern encryption] would be
development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers. - Bill Gates
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-01-05 2:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-12-28 0:32 Compilation issues using netlink.h Matthew Burgess
2010-01-05 2:32 ` Ben Hutchings
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).