netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: grundler@parisc-linux.org, brandon@ifup.org, grundler@google.com,
	tobias@ringis.se, kyle@mcmartin.ca, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] dmfe/tulip: Let dmfe handle DM910x except for SPARC on-board chips
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:41:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1262868111.2377.55.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100107.010651.18296756.davem@davemloft.net>

The Davicom DM9100 and DM9102 chips are used on the motherboards of
some SPARC systems (supported by the tulip driver) and also in PCI
expansion cards (supported by the dmfe driver).  There is no
difference in the PCI device ids for the two different configurations,
so these drivers both claim the device ids.  However, it is possible
to distinguish the two configurations by the presence of Open Firmware
properties for them, so we do that.

Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
---
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 01:06 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:51:25 -0800 (PST)
[...]
> > Applied, thanks everyone.
> 
> Sorry, had to revert, doesn't build:
[...]

When I asked for testing on SPARC, I intended that testers should
actually build both drivers!

Here's one more try.  I added conditional inclusion of <linux/of.h> in
dmfe.c.  It has to be conditional because that header doesn't compile on
architectures without OF support.  I also added parentheses to keep the
compiler happy.

Ben.

drivers/net/tulip/Kconfig      |    4 ++++
 drivers/net/tulip/dmfe.c       |   21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/net/tulip/tulip_core.c |   32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/tulip/Kconfig b/drivers/net/tulip/Kconfig
index 1cc8cf4..516713f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tulip/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/net/tulip/Kconfig
@@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ config TULIP_NAPI_HW_MITIGATION
 
 	  If in doubt, say Y.
 
+config TULIP_DM910X
+	def_bool y
+	depends on TULIP && SPARC
+
 config DE4X5
 	tristate "Generic DECchip & DIGITAL EtherWORKS PCI/EISA"
 	depends on PCI || EISA
diff --git a/drivers/net/tulip/dmfe.c b/drivers/net/tulip/dmfe.c
index ad63621..6f44ebf 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tulip/dmfe.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tulip/dmfe.c
@@ -92,6 +92,10 @@
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 #include <asm/irq.h>
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_TULIP_DM910X
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#endif
+
 
 /* Board/System/Debug information/definition ---------------- */
 #define PCI_DM9132_ID   0x91321282      /* Davicom DM9132 ID */
@@ -377,6 +381,23 @@ static int __devinit dmfe_init_one (struct pci_dev *pdev,
 	if (!printed_version++)
 		printk(version);
 
+	/*
+	 *	SPARC on-board DM910x chips should be handled by the main
+	 *	tulip driver, except for early DM9100s.
+	 */
+#ifdef CONFIG_TULIP_DM910X
+	if ((ent->driver_data == PCI_DM9100_ID && pdev->revision >= 0x30) ||
+	    ent->driver_data == PCI_DM9102_ID) {
+		struct device_node *dp = pci_device_to_OF_node(pdev);
+
+		if (dp && of_get_property(dp, "local-mac-address", NULL)) {
+			printk(KERN_INFO DRV_NAME
+			       ": skipping on-board DM910x (use tulip)\n");
+			return -ENODEV;
+		}
+	}
+#endif
+
 	/* Init network device */
 	dev = alloc_etherdev(sizeof(*db));
 	if (dev == NULL)
diff --git a/drivers/net/tulip/tulip_core.c b/drivers/net/tulip/tulip_core.c
index 0fa3140..595777d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tulip/tulip_core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tulip/tulip_core.c
@@ -196,9 +196,13 @@ struct tulip_chip_table tulip_tbl[] = {
 	| HAS_NWAY | HAS_PCI_MWI, tulip_timer, tulip_media_task },
 
   /* DM910X */
+#ifdef CONFIG_TULIP_DM910X
   { "Davicom DM9102/DM9102A", 128, 0x0001ebef,
 	HAS_MII | HAS_MEDIA_TABLE | CSR12_IN_SROM | HAS_ACPI,
 	tulip_timer, tulip_media_task },
+#else
+  { NULL },
+#endif
 
   /* RS7112 */
   { "Conexant LANfinity", 256, 0x0001ebef,
@@ -228,8 +232,10 @@ static struct pci_device_id tulip_pci_tbl[] = {
 	{ 0x1259, 0xa120, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, COMET },
 	{ 0x11F6, 0x9881, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, COMPEX9881 },
 	{ 0x8086, 0x0039, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, I21145 },
+#ifdef CONFIG_TULIP_DM910X
 	{ 0x1282, 0x9100, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, DM910X },
 	{ 0x1282, 0x9102, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, DM910X },
+#endif
 	{ 0x1113, 0x1216, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, COMET },
 	{ 0x1113, 0x1217, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, MX98715 },
 	{ 0x1113, 0x9511, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, COMET },
@@ -1299,18 +1305,30 @@ static int __devinit tulip_init_one (struct pci_dev *pdev,
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 *	Early DM9100's need software CRC and the DMFE driver
+	 *	DM910x chips should be handled by the dmfe driver, except
+	 *	on-board chips on SPARC systems.  Also, early DM9100s need
+	 *	software CRC which only the dmfe driver supports.
 	 */
 
-	if (pdev->vendor == 0x1282 && pdev->device == 0x9100)
-	{
-		/* Read Chip revision */
-		if (pdev->revision < 0x30)
-		{
-			printk(KERN_ERR PFX "skipping early DM9100 with Crc bug (use dmfe)\n");
+#ifdef CONFIG_TULIP_DM910X
+	if (chip_idx == DM910X) {
+		struct device_node *dp;
+
+		if (pdev->vendor == 0x1282 && pdev->device == 0x9100 &&
+		    pdev->revision < 0x30) {
+			printk(KERN_INFO PFX
+			       "skipping early DM9100 with Crc bug (use dmfe)\n");
+			return -ENODEV;
+		}
+
+		dp = pci_device_to_OF_node(pdev);
+		if (!(dp && of_get_property(dp, "local-mac-address", NULL))) {
+			printk(KERN_INFO PFX
+			       "skipping DM910x expansion card (use dmfe)\n");
 			return -ENODEV;
 		}
 	}
+#endif
 
 	/*
 	 *	Looks for early PCI chipsets where people report hangs
-- 
1.6.5.7



  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-07 12:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-05  3:03 [PATCH v2] dmfe/tulip: Let dmfe handle DM910x except for SPARC on-board chips Ben Hutchings
2010-01-05 16:58 ` Grant Grundler
2010-01-07  8:51   ` David Miller
2010-01-07  9:06     ` David Miller
2010-01-07 12:41       ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
2010-01-07 18:46         ` [PATCH v3] " Grant Grundler
2010-01-08  1:27           ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1262868111.2377.55.camel@localhost \
    --to=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=brandon@ifup.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=grundler@google.com \
    --cc=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=kyle@mcmartin.ca \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tobias@ringis.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).