From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: netdev: patchwork.ozlabs.org vs patchwork.kernel.org ?
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:40:37 -0800
Message-ID: <1263433237.1966.37.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
References: <3DBBD805E3BA064A87F551C0E8BD36740289748A@MAILSRV.intcomgrp.com>
	 <20100113.173253.223656114.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1755235Ab0ANBkm@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100113.173253.223656114.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 17:32 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> Encoding your patches as base64 binary octet stream attachments
> causes them to get missed by our automated patch tracking system:
> 
> 	http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/

What is the reason why netdev doesn't use patchwork.kernel.org?

It seems odd that it doesn't.  Odd like the arm mailing lists.