From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: netdev: patchwork.ozlabs.org vs patchwork.kernel.org ? Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:49:04 -0800 Message-ID: <1263433744.1966.52.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> References: <3DBBD805E3BA064A87F551C0E8BD36740289748A@MAILSRV.intcomgrp.com> <20100113.173253.223656114.davem@davemloft.net> <1263433237.1966.37.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20100113.174141.169192840.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail.perches.com ([173.55.12.10]:1157 "EHLO mail.perches.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752264Ab0ANBtF (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:49:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20100113.174141.169192840.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 17:41 -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Joe Perches > Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:40:37 -0800 > > On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 17:32 -0800, David Miller wrote: > >> Encoding your patches as base64 binary octet stream attachments > >> causes them to get missed by our automated patch tracking system: > >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/ > > What is the reason why netdev doesn't use patchwork.kernel.org? > > It seems odd that it doesn't. Odd like the arm mailing lists. > ozlabs was the original, and so just like powerpc port that's where we > started using the tool. > I honestly don't care where it's hosted. Neither do I, but it might be nice to put a link to the patchwork.ozlabs.org queues on this page http://patchwork.kernel.org/ (or the other way 'round, or both) so there's a centralized listing of all linux related patchwork queues.