Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: cold cold <nedkonedev@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 0% cpu usasge after fresh boot or net restart but 10% CPU if kernel flush route cache
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:16:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1264713387.3380.17.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41ac0f9e1001281049g119d5b1bgbc47f78150cac6ee@mail.gmail.com>

Le jeudi 28 janvier 2010 à 20:49 +0200, cold cold a écrit :
> what you mean drop packets ?
> 
> i test 2 different things and shearing results with you
> first test with high CPU is with garbage collection function
> second results represent CPU usage with totally disabled  garbage collection

ell, you didnt describe your benchmark method.

1) your results were on different rx/tx workload, and describing your
workload is very important to be able to compare results. Then it should
be exactly same workload.

For example, when tx/tx load is high enough, less cpu overhead is spent
on irq processing, since each IRQ delivers more packets per round.

2) you didnt sent "perf top" results for the second/last one.

  But the first "perf top" results showed less than 1% of cpu time was
used by cache cleanup. I guess you dont want to focus on this, since
its already very good.



Usually, when we want to bench a router, we study how it deals with DDOS
workload. Feeding lot of packets to the device and study what percentage
of them are actually transmitted. Goal being 100% of legit packets of
course.

Route cache settings matter in DDOS situations, and the flush operation
can have a big impact on dropped frames because of cpu/ram congestion.

Because of 600 seconds oscillations, its pretty hard to study exact cpu
use of a router, unless taking samples on long periods.




  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-28 21:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-26 16:58 0% cpu usasge after fresh boot or net restart but 10% CPU if kernel flush route cache cold cold
2010-01-27 15:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-01-27 19:53   ` cold cold
2010-01-27 21:18     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-01-28  9:14       ` cold cold
2010-01-28 16:09         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-01-28 16:26           ` cold cold
2010-01-28 17:06             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-01-28 18:49               ` cold cold
2010-01-28 21:16                 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-01-29  7:38                   ` cold cold
2010-01-29  9:06                     ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1264713387.3380.17.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=nedkonedev@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox