Re: CBQ broken in 2.6

[Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>]

Le jeudi 28 janvier 2010 à 19:48 +0000, Anton Ivanov a écrit :

> Well, I know CBQ reasonably well from a "network engineer" perspective.
> I used to run it production in an ISP 1998 and after that in an SMB
> 2002-2007. I have also been running it in lab and on my home network for
> 10+ years. Mostly on BSD though. There was even a point where I
> maintained a fork of the patches before they went into the main tree.
> The sole reason I ditched BSD was that they plugged it into the pf
> framework and it became too big of a hassle to port/maintain the
> configs.
> 
> I know what I am doing and HTB is not what I want. It is a good algo for
> expressing classic commerical relationships (CIR/PIR). It is worse than
> CBQ for "sharing" where all of the apps that share are your own and the
> scheduler/estimator is good.
> 
> Thanks for all the help. 

I am using CBQ myself with recent kernels and never found it
'borrowing', could you post a copy of your rules, or better, a subset of
them desmonstrating the problem ?