From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Hutchings Subject: Re: e1000e-1.1.2 Compile errors with 2.4.37 and gcc 2.95.3 Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:21:49 +0000 Message-ID: <1265714509.2671.134.camel@localhost> References: <20100209095803.236980@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Marco Schwarz Return-path: Received: from exchange.solarflare.com ([216.237.3.220]:41705 "EHLO exchange.solarflare.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754063Ab0BILV5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2010 06:21:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20100209095803.236980@gmx.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 10:58 +0100, Marco Schwarz wrote: > Hi, > > I get the following output when trying to compile e1000e-1.1.2 with Linux Kernel 2.4.37 and gcc 2.95.3 (e1000-8.0.16 compiles fine): [...] netdev only deals with recent 2.6 kernels. I'm amazed that Intel still wastes time on 2.4. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.