From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 1/7] xfrm: introduce basic mark infrastructure Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:00:35 -0500 Message-ID: <1266253235.6776.90.camel@bigi> References: <1266160732-946-1-git-send-email-hadi@cyberus.ca> <1266160732-946-2-git-send-email-hadi@cyberus.ca> <4B796B70.2050102@trash.net> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: timo.teras@iki.fi, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Patrick McHardy Return-path: Received: from mail-gx0-f224.google.com ([209.85.217.224]:54607 "EHLO mail-gx0-f224.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755774Ab0BORAh (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:00:37 -0500 Received: by gxk24 with SMTP id 24so5063401gxk.1 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:00:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B796B70.2050102@trash.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 16:42 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote: > This doesn't look right. A mark value of 0 with a mask of ~0 won't > be properly dumped. I think this should check for (m->m | m->v). > Good point, thanks. I will make that change; Rest of patches look reasonable? cheers, jamal