From: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"gospo@redhat.com" <gospo@redhat.com>,
"Fastabend, John R" <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 3/3] ixgbe: Do not allocate too many netdev txqueues
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:02:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1267318956.2052.1.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1267193054.9082.12.camel@edumazet-laptop>
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 06:04 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le vendredi 26 février 2010 à 01:15 -0800, Jeff Kirsher a écrit :
> > From: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
> >
> > Instead of allocating 128 struct netdev_queue per device, use the
> > minimum value between 128 and the number of possible txq's, to
> > reduce ram usage and "tc -s -d class shod dev .." output.
> >
> > This patch fixes Eric Dumazet's patch to set the TX queues to
> > the correct minimum.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> > 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> > index 4a01022..a961da2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> > @@ -5996,6 +5996,7 @@ static int __devinit ixgbe_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > const struct ixgbe_info *ii = ixgbe_info_tbl[ent->driver_data];
> > static int cards_found;
> > int i, err, pci_using_dac;
> > + unsigned int indices = num_possible_cpus();
> > #ifdef IXGBE_FCOE
> > u16 device_caps;
> > #endif
> > @@ -6034,7 +6035,18 @@ static int __devinit ixgbe_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > pci_set_master(pdev);
> > pci_save_state(pdev);
> >
> > - netdev = alloc_etherdev_mq(sizeof(struct ixgbe_adapter), MAX_TX_QUEUES);
> > + if (ii->mac == ixgbe_mac_82598EB)
> > + indices = min_t(unsigned int, indices, IXGBE_MAX_RSS_INDICES);
> > + else
> > + indices = min_t(unsigned int, indices, IXGBE_MAX_FDIR_INDICES);
> > +
> > + indices = max_t(unsigned int, indices, IXGBE_MAX_DCB_INDICES);
> > +#ifdef IXGBE_FCOE
> > + indices += min_t(unsigned int, num_possible_cpus(),
> > + IXGBE_MAX_FCOE_INDICES);
> > +#endif
> > + indices = min_t(unsigned int, indices, MAX_TX_QUEUES);
> > + netdev = alloc_etherdev_mq(sizeof(struct ixgbe_adapter), indices);
> > if (!netdev) {
> > err = -ENOMEM;
> > goto err_alloc_etherdev;
> >
>
> Thanks Jeff, but what is the reason for limiting to MAX_TX_QUEUES ?
> Is it a hardware issue ?
>
MAX_TX_QUEUES is 128, which is the maximum the 82599 device supports in
hardware (82598 supports 32 Tx queues). I'm not sure why you'd ever
want to have more Tx queues than what you have in the network device.
Perhaps I don't understand the question?
Cheers,
-PJ
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-28 1:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-26 9:14 [net-next-2.6 PATCH 1/3] ixgbe: Fix DMA mapping/unmapping issues when HWRSC is enabled on IOMMU enabled kernels Jeff Kirsher
2010-02-26 9:14 ` [net-next-2.6 PATCH 2/3] ixgbe: do not stop tx queues in ixgbe_set_tso Jeff Kirsher
2010-02-26 10:10 ` David Miller
2010-02-26 9:15 ` [net-next-2.6 PATCH 3/3] ixgbe: Do not allocate too many netdev txqueues Jeff Kirsher
2010-02-26 10:10 ` David Miller
2010-02-26 14:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-02-28 1:02 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr [this message]
2010-02-28 3:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-01 7:21 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2010-03-01 7:53 ` John Fastabend
2010-02-26 10:10 ` [net-next-2.6 PATCH 1/3] ixgbe: Fix DMA mapping/unmapping issues when HWRSC is enabled on IOMMU enabled kernels David Miller
2010-03-02 0:29 ` Simon Horman
2010-03-02 1:09 ` Chilakala, Mallikarjuna
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1267318956.2052.1.camel@localhost \
--to=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=gospo@redhat.com \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).