From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] device.h drivers/base/core.c Convert dev_ macros to functions Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:46:11 -0800 Message-ID: <1267757171.12993.111.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> References: <20100304165609.20849b93.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100304170030.f97c6630.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linus Torvalds , Nick Andrew , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton , David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail.perches.com ([173.55.12.10]:1402 "EHLO mail.perches.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754666Ab0CECqN (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Mar 2010 21:46:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20100304170030.f97c6630.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: dOn Thu, 2010-03-04 at 17:00 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 16:56:09 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 22:27:23 -0800 Joe Perches wrote: > > > Save ~60k in a defconfig > > > Use %pV and struct va_format > > > Format arguments are verified before printk > > Well that doesn't work very well. > > > > drivers/net/pcmcia/pcnet_cs.c:117: error: 'dev_info' redeclared as different kind of symbol > > include/linux/device.h:645: error: previous declaration of 'dev_info' was here > > > > there are lots of other dev_info's which will fail plus perhaps > > dev_err's, etc. > > > btw, this may be kludgeable aroundable by doing > > int _dev_info(const struct device *dev, const char *fmt, ...); > > #define dev_info(...) _dev_info(...) > > which will use the preprocessor's separation of `foo' from `foo()' to > fix things up. > > But it would be better to rename all those dev_info's to device_info or > whatever, IMO. Perhaps using the function name _dev_info() and adding the macro above is an acceptable workaround until the dev_info struct names or local variable names could be renamed if necessary. dev_err and dev_warn exist in source comments only and don't seem to be a problem. David Miller? Do you have an opinion on the renaming of dev_info local variables and structs?