From: "Michael Chan" <mchan@broadcom.com>
To: "Brian Haley" <brian.haley@hp.com>
Cc: "Bruno Prémont" <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>,
"Benjamin Li" <benli@broadcom.com>,
NetDEV <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BNX2: Kernel crashes with 2.6.31 and 2.6.31.9
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:49:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1268329796.9775.125.camel@nseg_linux_HP1.broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B9850DC.9060703@hp.com>
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 18:09 -0800, Brian Haley wrote:
> >> I'm able to cause a netdev_watchdog timeout by changing the coalesce
> >> settings on my bnx2, I built a little test program for it:
> >
> > Do you run this program in a loop? How quickly do you see the NETDEV
> > WATCHDOG?
>
> It's run once, and we see it almost immediately after ETHTOOL_SCOALESCE.
What's the difference between running the test program and doing ethtool
-C? Do you see the issue in either case? I don't see the issue here
with ethtool -C.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-11 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-29 7:49 BNX2: Kernel crashes with 2.6.31 and 2.6.31.9 Bruno Prémont
2009-12-29 9:05 ` Benjamin Li
2009-12-29 9:33 ` Bruno Prémont
2009-12-29 13:54 ` Bruno Prémont
2009-12-30 5:08 ` Benjamin Li
2010-02-19 8:10 ` Bruno Prémont
2010-02-19 19:57 ` Benjamin Li
2010-02-19 21:03 ` Brian Haley
2010-02-19 21:47 ` Benjamin Li
2010-02-23 12:15 ` Bruno Prémont
2010-03-02 1:26 ` Benjamin Li
2010-03-02 7:10 ` Bruno Prémont
2010-03-02 8:20 ` Bruno Prémont
2010-03-02 22:12 ` Michael Chan
2010-03-04 20:31 ` Brian Haley
2010-03-10 23:09 ` Brian Haley
2010-03-10 23:32 ` Michael Chan
2010-03-11 2:09 ` Brian Haley
2010-03-11 17:49 ` Michael Chan [this message]
2010-03-11 18:05 ` David Miller
2010-03-11 18:38 ` Michael Chan
2010-03-11 19:40 ` Brian Haley
2010-03-11 19:47 ` Michael Chan
2010-03-11 21:57 ` Brian Haley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1268329796.9775.125.camel@nseg_linux_HP1.broadcom.com \
--to=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=benli@broadcom.com \
--cc=bonbons@linux-vserver.org \
--cc=brian.haley@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).