From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael Chan" Subject: Re: BNX2: Kernel crashes with 2.6.31 and 2.6.31.9 Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:49:56 -0800 Message-ID: <1268329796.9775.125.camel@nseg_linux_HP1.broadcom.com> References: <20091229084929.54912c0c@pluto.restena.lu> <1262077540.12520.4.camel@localhost> <20091229145403.39f82773@pluto.restena.lu> <1262149691.2788.63.camel@localhost> <20100219091034.5fbb0165@pluto.restena.lu> <1266609426.2610.36.camel@dhcp-10-12-137-130.broadcom.com> <20100223131508.4c6cb866@neptune.home> <1267493170.2762.45.camel@dhcp-10-12-137-104.broadcom.com> <20100302081051.3d1b1c53@pluto.restena.lu> <20100302092020.52cfcd0e@pluto.restena.lu> <1267567926.19491.175.camel@nseg_linux_HP1.broadcom.com> <4B90189B.2040801@hp.com> <4B98268D.2020206@hp.com> <1268263973.9775.95.camel@nseg_linux_HP1.broadcom.com> <4B9850DC.9060703@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Bruno =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pr=E9mont?=" , "Benjamin Li" , NetDEV , Linux-Kernel To: "Brian Haley" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4B9850DC.9060703@hp.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 18:09 -0800, Brian Haley wrote: > >> I'm able to cause a netdev_watchdog timeout by changing the coalesce > >> settings on my bnx2, I built a little test program for it: > > > > Do you run this program in a loop? How quickly do you see the NETDEV > > WATCHDOG? > > It's run once, and we see it almost immediately after ETHTOOL_SCOALESCE. What's the difference between running the test program and doing ethtool -C? Do you see the issue in either case? I don't see the issue here with ethtool -C. Thanks.