From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] net: remove old tcp_optlen function Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:24:30 +0100 Message-ID: <1268479470.2947.33.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <4B98D592.6040301@gmail.com> <4B98D9A2.8060603@gmail.com> <4B9A40BC.4030301@gmail.com> <20100312174656.GA12175@bicker> <4B9AC8C5.2010300@gmail.com> <1268471488.2947.26.camel@edumazet-laptop> <4B9B7312.80301@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Dan Carpenter , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Developers , Linux Kernel Network Developers , David Miller , Michael Chan , Simon Horman To: William Allen Simpson Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4B9B7312.80301@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Le samedi 13 mars 2010 =C3=A0 06:12 -0500, William Allen Simpson a =C3=A9= crit : > Since you agree with David, perhaps you could kindly point out exactl= y > how your statement is true? Proof by assertion is generally not good > argumentation. >=20 You have to bring proof of your claims, not the reverse. You started the whole game, adding whole universe into this minor netde= v discussion for an obscure and yet to be aknowledged bug, not me. Therefore, I wont continue this trolling. You apparently want some public exposure I have no idea why. Have a good week end.