From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH] r8169: Fix rtl8169_rx_interrupt() Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:12:57 +0100 Message-ID: <1268723577.2824.17.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <20100307192305.GA598@elte.hu> <20100308125122.GA11242@redhat.com> <1268686865.2824.4.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1268699602.2824.14.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20100316065015.GA3336@swordfish.minsk.epam.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Oleg Nesterov , David Miller , Ingo Molnar , Francois Romieu , Peter Zijlstra , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel To: Sergey Senozhatsky Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100316065015.GA3336@swordfish.minsk.epam.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Le mardi 16 mars 2010 =C3=A0 08:50 +0200, Sergey Senozhatsky a =C3=A9cr= it : > Hello, >=20 > Sure. Give me a couple of days. By the way, should I test against .34 > or .33? >=20 It's an old bug anyway, so you can pick up whats is the best for you. My personal pref would be current kernel. To trigger the original condition (fifo overflow), you might flood your machine from another one with small packets, for example using pktgen. Thanks