From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Andy Gospodarek <gospo@redhat.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch 2/3] bridge: make bridge support netpoll
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:35:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1269297307.3552.23.camel@calx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100322082112.4967.5504.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>
On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 04:17 -0400, Amerigo Wang wrote:
> Based on the previous patch, make bridge support netpoll by:
>
> 1) implement the 4 methods to support netpoll for bridge;
>
> 2) modify netpoll during forwarding packets in bridge;
>
> 3) disable netpoll support of bridge when a netpoll-unabled device
> is added to bridge;
Not sure if this is the right thing to do. Shouldn't we simply enable
polling on all devices that support it and warn about the others (aka
best effort)?
--
http://selenic.com : development and support for Mercurial and Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-22 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-22 8:17 [RFC Patch 1/3] netpoll: add generic support for bridge and bonding devices Amerigo Wang
2010-03-22 8:17 ` [RFC Patch 2/3] bridge: make bridge support netpoll Amerigo Wang
2010-03-22 22:35 ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2010-03-23 2:03 ` Cong Wang
2010-03-23 4:27 ` Matt Mackall
2010-03-23 4:39 ` Cong Wang
2010-03-23 4:51 ` Matt Mackall
2010-03-23 4:59 ` David Miller
2010-03-23 5:00 ` Cong Wang
2010-03-23 4:57 ` David Miller
2010-03-23 5:06 ` Cong Wang
2010-03-22 8:17 ` [RFC Patch 3/3] bonding: make bonding " Amerigo Wang
2010-03-22 22:38 ` Matt Mackall
2010-03-22 23:36 ` Jay Vosburgh
2010-03-23 2:01 ` Cong Wang
2010-03-23 0:56 ` Andy Gospodarek
2010-03-23 1:49 ` Cong Wang
2010-03-22 22:31 ` [RFC Patch 1/3] netpoll: add generic support for bridge and bonding devices Matt Mackall
2010-03-23 2:13 ` Cong Wang
2010-03-23 3:49 ` David Miller
2010-03-23 4:47 ` Cong Wang
2010-03-23 4:58 ` David Miller
2010-03-23 5:15 ` Cong Wang
2010-03-23 12:11 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-03-24 2:29 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1269297307.3552.23.camel@calx \
--to=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=gospo@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).