From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] xfrm: remove policy lock when accessing policy->walk.dead Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 09:32:36 -0400 Message-ID: <1270042356.26743.30.camel@bigi> References: <1270030626-16687-1-git-send-email-timo.teras@iki.fi> <1270030626-16687-5-git-send-email-timo.teras@iki.fi> <20100331110345.GC12845@gondor.apana.org.au> <1270040773.26743.12.camel@bigi> <20100331131131.GA13793@gondor.apana.org.au> <20100331132622.GA13908@gondor.apana.org.au> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Timo Teras , netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from mail-qy0-f179.google.com ([209.85.221.179]:41864 "EHLO mail-qy0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933319Ab0CaNck (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 09:32:40 -0400 Received: by qyk9 with SMTP id 9so94239qyk.1 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 06:32:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100331132622.GA13908@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 21:26 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > In fact the previous behaviour is also consistent with RFC2367: I did not touch pfkey. That behavior remains there. cheers, jamal