From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Timo Teras <timo.teras@iki.fi>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] xfrm: remove policy lock when accessing policy->walk.dead
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:15:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1270044911.26743.62.camel@bigi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100331135629.GD14082@gondor.apana.org.au>
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 21:56 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> No you've changed it. PF_KEY will no longer notify if the policy
> table is empty.
>
> This is inconsistent with the behaviour of SADB flushes, and the
> spirit of RFC2367.
I did not mean to change it for pfkey. I do believe there are apps that
need it.
I will run some tests and if it breaks - I will send a patch.
cheers,
jamal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-31 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-31 10:17 [PATCH 0/4] xfrm fixes and flow structurization Timo Teras
2010-03-31 10:17 ` Timo Teras
2010-03-31 10:17 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfrm: increment genid before bumping state genids Timo Teras
2010-03-31 10:50 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-31 10:55 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-31 11:01 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-31 11:19 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-31 11:24 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-31 10:17 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfrm_user: verify policy direction at XFRM_MSG_POLEXPIRE handler Timo Teras
2010-03-31 10:54 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-31 10:17 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfrm: remove policy lock when accessing policy->walk.dead Timo Teras
2010-03-31 11:03 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-31 13:06 ` jamal
2010-03-31 13:11 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-31 13:26 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-31 13:32 ` jamal
2010-03-31 13:39 ` jamal
2010-03-31 13:41 ` jamal
2010-03-31 13:56 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-31 14:15 ` jamal [this message]
2010-03-31 20:54 ` David Miller
2010-03-31 13:55 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-31 14:12 ` jamal
2010-03-31 14:15 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-31 14:24 ` jamal
2010-03-31 14:29 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-31 14:38 ` jamal
2010-03-31 20:57 ` David Miller
2010-04-01 0:22 ` Herbert Xu
2010-04-01 2:19 ` jamal
2010-04-01 10:53 ` jamal
2010-03-31 13:28 ` jamal
2010-03-31 13:53 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-31 16:41 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-31 17:47 ` jamal
2010-04-01 11:24 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-31 20:52 ` David Miller
2010-03-31 10:17 ` [PATCH 4/4] flow: structurize flow cache Timo Teras
2010-03-31 11:21 ` Herbert Xu
2010-04-02 2:42 ` [PATCH 0/4] xfrm fixes and flow structurization David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1270044911.26743.62.camel@bigi \
--to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=timo.teras@iki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).