Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: avahi-daemon: caller is netif_rx
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:14:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1271142857.16881.193.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2m65634d661004121354ta0189542l80473b82911e43f4@mail.gmail.com>

Le lundi 12 avril 2010 à 13:54 -0700, Tom Herbert a écrit :

> Would it be better to disable preemption in netif_rx?  Also note that
> with RFS we would be taking rcu_read_lock in netif_rx anyway and that
> could cover all the instances of smp_processor_id().
> 

Ok that makes sense.

What do you think applying a small fix before RFS integration, it is
better to have smaller patches anyway :)

[PATCH net-next-2.6] net: netif_rx() must disable preemption

Eric Paris reported netif_rx() is calling smp_processor_id() from
preemptible context, in particular when caller is
ip_dev_loopback_xmit().

RPS commit added this smp_processor_id() call, this patch makes sure
preemption is disabled. rps_get_cpus() wants rcu_read_lock() anyway, we
can dot it a bit earlier.

Reported-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
---
 net/core/dev.c |   19 ++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index a10a216..a96ea6a 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -2206,6 +2206,7 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct netif_rx_stats, netdev_rx_stat) = { 0, };
 /*
  * get_rps_cpu is called from netif_receive_skb and returns the target
  * CPU from the RPS map of the receiving queue for a given skb.
+ * rcu_read_lock must be held on entry.
  */
 static int get_rps_cpu(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
@@ -2217,8 +2218,6 @@ static int get_rps_cpu(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	u8 ip_proto;
 	u32 addr1, addr2, ports, ihl;
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
-
 	if (skb_rx_queue_recorded(skb)) {
 		u16 index = skb_get_rx_queue(skb);
 		if (unlikely(index >= dev->num_rx_queues)) {
@@ -2296,7 +2295,6 @@ got_hash:
 	}
 
 done:
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return cpu;
 }
 
@@ -2392,7 +2390,7 @@ enqueue:
 
 int netif_rx(struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
-	int cpu;
+	int ret;
 
 	/* if netpoll wants it, pretend we never saw it */
 	if (netpoll_rx(skb))
@@ -2402,14 +2400,21 @@ int netif_rx(struct sk_buff *skb)
 		net_timestamp(skb);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_RPS
+	{
+	int cpu;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	cpu = get_rps_cpu(skb->dev, skb);
 	if (cpu < 0)
 		cpu = smp_processor_id();
+	ret = enqueue_to_backlog(skb, cpu);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	}
 #else
-	cpu = smp_processor_id();
+	ret = enqueue_to_backlog(skb, get_cpu());
+	put_cpu();
 #endif
-
-	return enqueue_to_backlog(skb, cpu);
+	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_rx);
 



  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-13  7:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-12 19:20 BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: avahi-daemon: caller is netif_rx Eric Paris
2010-04-12 19:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-12 20:54   ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-13  7:14     ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-04-15  7:14       ` David Miller
2010-04-15  7:30         ` Changli Gao
2010-04-15  7:37           ` David Miller
2010-04-15  7:47             ` Changli Gao
2010-04-15  7:57               ` David Miller
2010-04-15  8:27                 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-15  8:33                   ` David Miller
2010-04-15  8:58                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-15  8:49               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-15  9:02                 ` David Miller
2010-04-15 10:29                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-15 13:16   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-15 19:07     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-15 19:13     ` [PATCH] ip: Fix ip_dev_loopback_xmit() Eric Dumazet
2010-04-15 21:26       ` David Miller
2010-04-16  0:03         ` Changli Gao
2010-04-16  0:15           ` David Miller
2010-04-16  0:19             ` Changli Gao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1271142857.16881.193.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=therbert@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox