From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: avahi-daemon: caller is netif_rx
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:14:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1271142857.16881.193.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2m65634d661004121354ta0189542l80473b82911e43f4@mail.gmail.com>
Le lundi 12 avril 2010 à 13:54 -0700, Tom Herbert a écrit :
> Would it be better to disable preemption in netif_rx? Also note that
> with RFS we would be taking rcu_read_lock in netif_rx anyway and that
> could cover all the instances of smp_processor_id().
>
Ok that makes sense.
What do you think applying a small fix before RFS integration, it is
better to have smaller patches anyway :)
[PATCH net-next-2.6] net: netif_rx() must disable preemption
Eric Paris reported netif_rx() is calling smp_processor_id() from
preemptible context, in particular when caller is
ip_dev_loopback_xmit().
RPS commit added this smp_processor_id() call, this patch makes sure
preemption is disabled. rps_get_cpus() wants rcu_read_lock() anyway, we
can dot it a bit earlier.
Reported-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
---
net/core/dev.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index a10a216..a96ea6a 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -2206,6 +2206,7 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct netif_rx_stats, netdev_rx_stat) = { 0, };
/*
* get_rps_cpu is called from netif_receive_skb and returns the target
* CPU from the RPS map of the receiving queue for a given skb.
+ * rcu_read_lock must be held on entry.
*/
static int get_rps_cpu(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
@@ -2217,8 +2218,6 @@ static int get_rps_cpu(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
u8 ip_proto;
u32 addr1, addr2, ports, ihl;
- rcu_read_lock();
-
if (skb_rx_queue_recorded(skb)) {
u16 index = skb_get_rx_queue(skb);
if (unlikely(index >= dev->num_rx_queues)) {
@@ -2296,7 +2295,6 @@ got_hash:
}
done:
- rcu_read_unlock();
return cpu;
}
@@ -2392,7 +2390,7 @@ enqueue:
int netif_rx(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
- int cpu;
+ int ret;
/* if netpoll wants it, pretend we never saw it */
if (netpoll_rx(skb))
@@ -2402,14 +2400,21 @@ int netif_rx(struct sk_buff *skb)
net_timestamp(skb);
#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
+ {
+ int cpu;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
cpu = get_rps_cpu(skb->dev, skb);
if (cpu < 0)
cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ ret = enqueue_to_backlog(skb, cpu);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ }
#else
- cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ ret = enqueue_to_backlog(skb, get_cpu());
+ put_cpu();
#endif
-
- return enqueue_to_backlog(skb, cpu);
+ return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_rx);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-13 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-12 19:20 BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: avahi-daemon: caller is netif_rx Eric Paris
2010-04-12 19:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-12 20:54 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-13 7:14 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-04-15 7:14 ` David Miller
2010-04-15 7:30 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-15 7:37 ` David Miller
2010-04-15 7:47 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-15 7:57 ` David Miller
2010-04-15 8:27 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-15 8:33 ` David Miller
2010-04-15 8:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-15 8:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-15 9:02 ` David Miller
2010-04-15 10:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-15 13:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-15 19:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-15 19:13 ` [PATCH] ip: Fix ip_dev_loopback_xmit() Eric Dumazet
2010-04-15 21:26 ` David Miller
2010-04-16 0:03 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-16 0:15 ` David Miller
2010-04-16 0:19 ` Changli Gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1271142857.16881.193.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox