Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next-2.6] fasync: RCU locking
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:42:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1271230961.16881.630.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)

Paul, could you please check this patch, I am not sure
of the IRQ safety thing...

Is call_rcu() the right method to use in this case ?

Thanks

[PATCH net-next-2.6] fasync: RCU locking

kill_fasync() uses a central rwlock, candidate for RCU conversion.

We can remove __kill_fasync() direct use in net, and rename it to
kill_fasync_rcu()

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
---
 fs/fcntl.c         |   36 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 include/linux/fs.h |   11 +++++------
 net/socket.c       |    4 ++--
 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fcntl.c b/fs/fcntl.c
index 452d02f..33cb3ee 100644
--- a/fs/fcntl.c
+++ b/fs/fcntl.c
@@ -614,9 +614,15 @@ int send_sigurg(struct fown_struct *fown)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static DEFINE_RWLOCK(fasync_lock);
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(fasync_lock);
 static struct kmem_cache *fasync_cache __read_mostly;
 
+static void fasync_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
+{
+	kmem_cache_free(fasync_cache,
+			container_of(head, struct fasync_struct, fa_rcu));
+}
+
 /*
  * Remove a fasync entry. If successfully removed, return
  * positive and clear the FASYNC flag. If no entry exists,
@@ -634,17 +640,17 @@ static int fasync_remove_entry(struct file *filp, struct fasync_struct **fapp)
 	int result = 0;
 
 	spin_lock(&filp->f_lock);
-	write_lock_irq(&fasync_lock);
+	spin_lock_irq(&fasync_lock);
 	for (fp = fapp; (fa = *fp) != NULL; fp = &fa->fa_next) {
 		if (fa->fa_file != filp)
 			continue;
 		*fp = fa->fa_next;
-		kmem_cache_free(fasync_cache, fa);
+		call_rcu(&fa->fa_rcu, fasync_free_rcu);
 		filp->f_flags &= ~FASYNC;
 		result = 1;
 		break;
 	}
-	write_unlock_irq(&fasync_lock);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&fasync_lock);
 	spin_unlock(&filp->f_lock);
 	return result;
 }
@@ -666,7 +672,7 @@ static int fasync_add_entry(int fd, struct file *filp, struct fasync_struct **fa
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	spin_lock(&filp->f_lock);
-	write_lock_irq(&fasync_lock);
+	spin_lock_irq(&fasync_lock);
 	for (fp = fapp; (fa = *fp) != NULL; fp = &fa->fa_next) {
 		if (fa->fa_file != filp)
 			continue;
@@ -679,12 +685,12 @@ static int fasync_add_entry(int fd, struct file *filp, struct fasync_struct **fa
 	new->fa_file = filp;
 	new->fa_fd = fd;
 	new->fa_next = *fapp;
-	*fapp = new;
+	rcu_assign_pointer(*fapp, new);
 	result = 1;
 	filp->f_flags |= FASYNC;
 
 out:
-	write_unlock_irq(&fasync_lock);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&fasync_lock);
 	spin_unlock(&filp->f_lock);
 	return result;
 }
@@ -704,7 +710,10 @@ int fasync_helper(int fd, struct file * filp, int on, struct fasync_struct **fap
 
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(fasync_helper);
 
-void __kill_fasync(struct fasync_struct *fa, int sig, int band)
+/*
+ * rcu_read_lock() is held
+ */
+static void kill_fasync_rcu(struct fasync_struct *fa, int sig, int band)
 {
 	while (fa) {
 		struct fown_struct * fown;
@@ -719,22 +728,19 @@ void __kill_fasync(struct fasync_struct *fa, int sig, int band)
 		   mechanism. */
 		if (!(sig == SIGURG && fown->signum == 0))
 			send_sigio(fown, fa->fa_fd, band);
-		fa = fa->fa_next;
+		fa = rcu_dereference(fa->fa_next);
 	}
 }
 
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kill_fasync);
-
 void kill_fasync(struct fasync_struct **fp, int sig, int band)
 {
 	/* First a quick test without locking: usually
 	 * the list is empty.
 	 */
 	if (*fp) {
-		read_lock(&fasync_lock);
-		/* reread *fp after obtaining the lock */
-		__kill_fasync(*fp, sig, band);
-		read_unlock(&fasync_lock);
+		rcu_read_lock();
+		kill_fasync_rcu(rcu_dereference(*fp), sig, band);
+		rcu_read_unlock();
 	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(kill_fasync);
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 39d57bc..158b2cc 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1280,10 +1280,11 @@ static inline int lock_may_write(struct inode *inode, loff_t start,
 
 
 struct fasync_struct {
-	int	magic;
-	int	fa_fd;
-	struct	fasync_struct	*fa_next; /* singly linked list */
-	struct	file 		*fa_file;
+	int			magic;
+	int			fa_fd;
+	struct fasync_struct	*fa_next; /* singly linked list */
+	struct file		*fa_file;
+	struct rcu_head		fa_rcu;
 };
 
 #define FASYNC_MAGIC 0x4601
@@ -1292,8 +1293,6 @@ struct fasync_struct {
 extern int fasync_helper(int, struct file *, int, struct fasync_struct **);
 /* can be called from interrupts */
 extern void kill_fasync(struct fasync_struct **, int, int);
-/* only for net: no internal synchronization */
-extern void __kill_fasync(struct fasync_struct *, int, int);
 
 extern int __f_setown(struct file *filp, struct pid *, enum pid_type, int force);
 extern int f_setown(struct file *filp, unsigned long arg, int force);
diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
index 35bc198..846739c 100644
--- a/net/socket.c
+++ b/net/socket.c
@@ -1159,10 +1159,10 @@ int sock_wake_async(struct socket *sock, int how, int band)
 		/* fall through */
 	case SOCK_WAKE_IO:
 call_kill:
-		__kill_fasync(sock->fasync_list, SIGIO, band);
+		kill_fasync(sock->fasync_list, SIGIO, band);
 		break;
 	case SOCK_WAKE_URG:
-		__kill_fasync(sock->fasync_list, SIGURG, band);
+		kill_fasync(sock->fasync_list, SIGURG, band);
 	}
 	return 0;
 }

             reply	other threads:[~2010-04-14  7:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-14  7:42 Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-04-14  8:36 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] fasync: RCU locking Lai Jiangshan
2010-04-14 14:57   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-14 15:34     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-14 19:55       ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 v3] fasync: RCU and fine grained locking Eric Dumazet
2010-04-21 23:20         ` David Miller
2010-04-14 15:41 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] fasync: RCU locking Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-21 23:19 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1271230961.16881.630.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox