From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Flavio Leitner <fleitner@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] TCP: avoid to send keepalive probes if it is receiving data
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 19:15:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1271610919.16881.5564.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1271602519-6805-1-git-send-email-fleitner@redhat.com>
Le dimanche 18 avril 2010 à 11:55 -0300, Flavio Leitner a écrit :
> RFC 1122 says the following:
> ...
> Keep-alive packets MUST only be sent when no data or
> acknowledgement packets have been received for the
> connection within an interval.
> ...
>
> Fix this by storing the timestamp of last received data
> packet and checking for it when the keepalive timer expires.
>
> -v2 fix do_tcp_setsockopt() as pointed by Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Flavio Leitner <fleitner@redhat.com>
I find this patch very welcome, and we could easily use this new
lrcvtime information available in diagnostic tools (ss command)
But are you sure you update it for all valid packets ?
If we receive a pure ACK, it seems you do not ...
> ---
> include/linux/tcp.h | 1 +
> net/ipv4/tcp.c | 5 ++++-
> net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 3 +++
> net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c | 8 ++++++++
> 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/tcp.h b/include/linux/tcp.h
> index a778ee0..405678f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/tcp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/tcp.h
> @@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ struct tcp_sock {
> u32 snd_sml; /* Last byte of the most recently transmitted small packet */
> u32 rcv_tstamp; /* timestamp of last received ACK (for keepalives) */
> u32 lsndtime; /* timestamp of last sent data packet (for restart window) */
> + u32 lrcvtime; /* timestamp of last received data packet (for keepalives) */
>
> /* Data for direct copy to user */
> struct {
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> index 0f8caf6..a4048d7 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> @@ -2298,7 +2298,10 @@ static int do_tcp_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level,
> if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_KEEPOPEN) &&
> !((1 << sk->sk_state) &
> (TCPF_CLOSE | TCPF_LISTEN))) {
> - __u32 elapsed = tcp_time_stamp - tp->rcv_tstamp;
> + u32 elapsed = min_t(u32,
> + tcp_time_stamp - tp->rcv_tstamp,
> + tcp_time_stamp - tp->lrcvtime);
> +
> if (tp->keepalive_time > elapsed)
> elapsed = tp->keepalive_time - elapsed;
> else
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> index f240f57..60d2980 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> @@ -5391,6 +5391,8 @@ no_ack:
> __kfree_skb(skb);
> else
> sk->sk_data_ready(sk, 0);
> +
> + tp->lrcvtime = tcp_time_stamp;
> return 0;
> }
> }
> @@ -5421,6 +5423,7 @@ step5:
>
> tcp_data_snd_check(sk);
> tcp_ack_snd_check(sk);
> + tp->lrcvtime = tcp_time_stamp;
> return 0;
>
> csum_error:
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c
> index 8a0ab29..74dd804 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c
> @@ -554,6 +554,14 @@ static void tcp_keepalive_timer (unsigned long data)
> if (tp->packets_out || tcp_send_head(sk))
> goto resched;
>
> + elapsed = tcp_time_stamp - tp->lrcvtime;
> +
> + /* receiving data means alive */
> + if (elapsed < keepalive_time_when(tp)) {
> + elapsed = keepalive_time_when(tp) - elapsed;
> + goto resched;
> + }
> +
> elapsed = tcp_time_stamp - tp->rcv_tstamp;
>
> if (elapsed >= keepalive_time_when(tp)) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-18 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-16 15:06 TCP keepalive question Flavio Leitner
2010-04-17 17:28 ` [PATCH] TCP: avoid to send keepalive probes if it is receiving data Flavio Leitner
2010-04-18 9:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-18 14:55 ` [PATCH v2] " Flavio Leitner
2010-04-18 17:15 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-04-18 20:34 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2010-04-22 5:42 ` David Miller
2010-04-25 23:55 ` Flavio Leitner
2010-04-26 2:40 ` [PATCH v3] TCP: avoid to send keepalive probes if " Flavio Leitner
2010-04-26 9:47 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2010-04-26 18:24 ` David Miller
2010-04-27 4:33 ` [PATCH v4] " Flavio Leitner
2010-04-27 5:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-27 6:08 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2010-04-27 19:55 ` David Miller
2010-04-25 23:44 ` [PATCH v2] TCP: avoid to send keepalive probes if it is " Flavio Leitner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1271610919.16881.5564.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fleitner@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox