From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: Introduce skb_orphan_try() Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:10:33 +0200 Message-ID: <1271920233.7895.4723.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <1271456302.16881.4559.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20100418.024601.85853662.davem@davemloft.net> <1271830116.7895.1316.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20100421.225625.177238009.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f225.google.com ([209.85.218.225]:34099 "EHLO mail-bw0-f225.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751731Ab0DVHKp (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Apr 2010 03:10:45 -0400 Received: by bwz25 with SMTP id 25so9159646bwz.28 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:10:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100421.225625.177238009.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le mercredi 21 avril 2010 =C3=A0 22:56 -0700, David Miller a =C3=A9crit= : > Right, I've applied this, thanks. >=20 > What we should probably do instead is call and NULL out the > DEV_GSO_CB() destructor. Right? Yes, probably, I'll take a look at this if you want. Thanks