From: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss] IPv4 packets lost with macvlan over bond alb
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 18:42:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1272.1687398130@famine> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPwn2JRuU0+XEOnsETjrOpRi4YYXT+BemsaH1K5cAOnP4G-Wvw@mail.gmail.com>
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 9:45 AM Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Hi Jay, any thoughts?
>>
>> Just an update that I've done some poking with your reproducer;
>> as described, the ARP reply for the IP address associated with the
>> macvlan interface is coming back with the bond's MAC, not the MAC of the
>> macvlan. If I manually create a neighbour entry on the client with the
>> corrent IP and MAC for the macvlan, then connectivity works as expected.
>>
>> I'll have to look a bit further into the ARP MAC selection logic
>> here (i.e., where does that MAC come from when the ARP reply is
>> generated). It also makes me wonder what's special about macvlan, e.g.,
>> why doesn't regular VLAN (or other stacked devices) fail in the same way
>> (or maybe it does and nobody has noticed).
>
>VLAN or other overlay devices use the same MAC address with Bonding.
>So they work with the alb mode. But MACVLAN uses different MAC
>addresses with Bonding.
By default, yes, VLANs use the same MAC, but may use a different
MAC than the device the VLAN is configured above. However, changing the
VLAN's MAC address in a similar test case (VLAN above balance-alb bond)
still works, because VLAN packets are delivered by matching the VLAN ID
(via vlan_do_receive() -> vlan_find_dev()), not via the MAC address.
So, the RLB MAC edits done by rlb_arp_xmit() work in the sense
that traffic flows, even though peers see a MAC address from the bond
for the VLAN IP, not the VLAN's actual MAC address.
A bridge can also use a MAC address that differs from the bond,
but rlb_arp_xmit() has a special case for bridge, and doesn't alter the
ARP if the relevant IP address is on a bridge (so, no balancing).
Changing rlb_arp_xmit() to add macvlan to the bridge check makes
the test case pass, e.g.,
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
index b9dbad3a8af8..f720c419dfb7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
@@ -668,7 +668,7 @@ static struct slave *rlb_arp_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct bonding *bond)
dev = ip_dev_find(dev_net(bond->dev), arp->ip_src);
if (dev) {
- if (netif_is_bridge_master(dev)) {
+ if (netif_is_bridge_master(dev) || netif_is_macvlan(dev)) {
dev_put(dev);
return NULL;
}
but I'm not completely sure that's doing the right thing with
regard to the macvlan logic in alb_send_learning_packets() ->
alb_upper_dev_walk().
-J
---
-Jay Vosburgh, jay.vosburgh@canonical.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-22 1:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-02 8:08 [Discuss] IPv4 packets lost with macvlan over bond alb Hangbin Liu
2023-06-08 3:43 ` Hangbin Liu
2023-06-08 4:44 ` Jay Vosburgh
2023-06-17 1:45 ` Jay Vosburgh
2023-06-17 8:29 ` Hangbin Liu
2023-06-22 1:42 ` Jay Vosburgh [this message]
2023-06-25 7:37 ` Hangbin Liu
2023-07-14 9:18 ` Hangbin Liu
2023-08-05 8:25 ` Hangbin Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1272.1687398130@famine \
--to=jay.vosburgh@canonical.com \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).