From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: DDoS attack causing bad effect on conntrack searches Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:23:22 +0200 Message-ID: <1272014602.7895.7845.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <1271941082.14501.189.camel@jdb-workstation> <4BD04C74.9020402@trash.net> <1271946961.7895.5665.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1271948029.7895.5707.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20100422155123.GA2524@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1271952128.7895.5851.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1271970199.7895.6482.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1272008780.7895.7746.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Patrick McHardy , hawk@comx.dk, Linux Kernel Network Hackers , Netfilter Developers To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f225.google.com ([209.85.218.225]:65002 "EHLO mail-bw0-f225.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754445Ab0DWJXg (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Apr 2010 05:23:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le vendredi 23 avril 2010 =C3=A0 09:55 +0200, Jan Engelhardt a =C3=A9cr= it : > On Friday 2010-04-23 09:46, Eric Dumazet wrote: > >Years ago, we had to manually change PAGE_OFFSET, and I remember som= e > >machines with PAGE_OFFSET 0xA0000000 (1.5 GB LOWMEM),=20 > >or 0xB0000000 (1.25 GB), (PAE off) >=20 > I notice that 0xB0000000, which is now known as LOWMEM_3G_OPT, > is only available when PAE is off. Would you know the reason for > that decision? Are some values unsuitable for PAE? >=20 If PAE was on, PAGE_OFFSET must be a 1GB multiple. This is because of hardware limitations.