From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: reimplement softnet_data.output_queue as a FIFO queue Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:30:59 +0200 Message-ID: <1272274259.2346.23.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <1272252361-11799-1-git-send-email-xiaosuo@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Changli Gao Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com ([209.85.218.219]:55108 "EHLO mail-bw0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751010Ab0DZJbG (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Apr 2010 05:31:06 -0400 Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so2132bwz.21 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:31:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le lundi 26 avril 2010 =C3=A0 17:11 +0800, Changli Gao a =C3=A9crit : > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Changli Gao wro= te: > > reimplement softnet_data.output_queue as a FIFO queue. > > > > reimplement softnet_data.output_queue as a FIFO queue to keep the f= airness among > > the qdiscs rescheduled. > > >=20 > Dear Eric: > do you think it is worth continuing? I didn't received any comments > even negative ones. I am really sorry for disrupting you, but I don't > know what did it mean. >=20 =46or this patch I had no comment, I believe it is fine, at a first glance... Please give some time for netdev people to review it and Ack it.