From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: rick.jones2@hp.com, therbert@google.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bnx2x: add support for receive hashing
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:11:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1272316297.8918.49.camel@bigi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100426.134051.232750473.davem@davemloft.net>
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 13:40 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> Why do you think Eric Dumazet gives a crap about UDP scalability and
> is constantly testing it? What about VOIP? H.323, RTP, etc.?
This is big of course. All the SIP/RTP stuff is largely UDP. Most P2P
control is via UDP. I think i did read somewhere on measurement taken
in backbones showing consistent rise of UDP:TCP ratio (need to search
my bookmarks).
It borders on lunacy to assume TCP only. Time to get an open source NIC
out there and ignore these big players? ;->
cheers,
jamal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-26 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-23 5:54 [PATCH] bnx2x: add support for receive hashing Tom Herbert
2010-04-23 7:11 ` David Miller
2010-04-26 17:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-26 17:38 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-26 17:47 ` Ben Hutchings
2010-04-26 17:56 ` David Miller
2010-04-26 18:04 ` David Miller
2010-04-26 18:19 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-26 18:22 ` David Miller
2010-04-26 20:19 ` Rick Jones
2010-04-26 20:40 ` David Miller
2010-04-26 20:48 ` Rick Jones
2010-04-26 20:53 ` David Miller
2010-04-26 21:12 ` Rick Jones
2010-04-27 18:31 ` Eilon Greenstein
2010-04-27 19:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-26 20:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-04-26 21:11 ` jamal [this message]
2010-04-26 21:14 ` jamal
2010-04-26 23:27 ` Brian Bloniarz
2010-04-27 13:37 ` Brian Bloniarz
2010-04-27 14:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-27 15:44 ` Brian Bloniarz
2010-04-27 16:51 ` David Miller
2010-04-27 17:02 ` Brian Bloniarz
2010-04-27 17:06 ` David Miller
2010-04-27 17:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-27 17:20 ` David Miller
2010-04-27 17:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-27 20:21 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: sk_add_backlog() take rmem_alloc into account Eric Dumazet
2010-04-27 21:43 ` David Miller
2010-04-27 22:11 ` David Miller
2010-04-27 22:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-28 15:41 ` Brian Bloniarz
2010-04-28 15:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-27 17:31 ` [PATCH] bnx2x: add support for receive hashing Tom Herbert
2010-04-27 17:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-07-04 16:36 ` Vladislav Zolotarov
2010-07-04 16:46 ` Vladislav Zolotarov
2010-07-06 7:16 ` Vladislav Zolotarov
2010-07-07 19:17 ` Tom Herbert
2010-07-08 8:40 ` Vladislav Zolotarov
2010-07-11 2:12 ` David Miller
2010-07-11 10:02 ` Vladislav Zolotarov
2010-07-11 13:16 ` Vladislav Zolotarov
2010-07-11 16:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-07-11 17:22 ` Vladislav Zolotarov
2010-07-11 17:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-07-11 18:18 ` Vladislav Zolotarov
2010-07-11 22:34 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1272316297.8918.49.camel@bigi \
--to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).