From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: [PATCH] bnx2x: add support for receive hashing Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:14:17 -0400 Message-ID: <1272316457.8918.51.camel@bigi> References: <20100426.112244.260086869.davem@davemloft.net> <4BD5F553.6020006@hp.com> <20100426.134051.232750473.davem@davemloft.net> <1272316297.8918.49.camel@bigi> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: rick.jones2@hp.com, therbert@google.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-iw0-f202.google.com ([209.85.223.202]:51920 "EHLO mail-iw0-f202.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753410Ab0DZVOV (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:14:21 -0400 Received: by iwn40 with SMTP id 40so3497046iwn.1 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:14:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1272316297.8918.49.camel@bigi> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 17:11 -0400, jamal wrote: > I think i did read somewhere on measurement taken > in backbones showing consistent rise of UDP:TCP ratio (need to search > my bookmarks). This one: http://www.caida.org/research/traffic-analysis/tcpudpratio/ just read the conclusion. cheers, jamal