From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH] bnx2x: add support for receive hashing Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:36:08 +0200 Message-ID: <1272389768.2295.402.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <20100426.110432.104061817.davem@davemloft.net> <4BD6E887.3000804@athenacr.com> <20100427.095108.68126984.davem@davemloft.net> <1272388439.2295.369.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: David Miller , bmb@athenacr.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, rick.jones2@hp.com To: Tom Herbert Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com ([209.85.218.219]:57020 "EHLO mail-bw0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755299Ab0D0Rlq (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:41:46 -0400 Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so1908bwz.21 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:41:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le mardi 27 avril 2010 =C3=A0 10:31 -0700, Tom Herbert a =C3=A9crit : > This is the problem that we are addressing with so_reuseport! How standard applications are protected against a DDOS ?