From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Skala Subject: iputils flowlabel Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:51:48 +0200 Message-ID: <1272444708.3035.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35022 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751826Ab0D1Ivu (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2010 04:51:50 -0400 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3S8pn4W007240 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 04:51:50 -0400 Received: from [10.34.29.135] (dhcp-29-135.brq.redhat.com [10.34.29.135]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3S8pmCm017510 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 04:51:49 -0400 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, I'd like to ask about current state of FLOWLABEL functionality. This is currently wrapped into define and disabled by default. Trying to enable it means to define (somehow = in proprietary header) in6_flowlabel_req structure because usage of linux/in6.h conflicts with glibc's headers. Is flowlabel fnc inside ifdef due to described 'header' issue? Any other comment to this topic? Thanks Jiri