From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>,
Alex Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>,
PJ Waskiewicz <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>,
John Ronciak <john.ronciak@intel.com>,
e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] ixgb and e1000: Use new function for copybreak tests
Date: Sun, 02 May 2010 17:46:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1272847591.30040.15.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> (raw)
There appears to be an off-by-1 defect in the maximum packet size
copied when copybreak is speified in these modules.
The copybreak module params are specified as:
"Maximum size of packet that is copied to a new buffer on receive"
The tests are changed from "< copybreak" to "<= copybreak"
and moved into new static functions for readability.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
---
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
drivers/net/ixgb/ixgb_main.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
index e6ebc22..2adc83c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
@@ -3773,6 +3773,31 @@ next_desc:
return cleaned;
}
+/*
+ * this should improve performance for small packets with large amounts
+ * of reassembly being done in the stack
+ */
+static void e1000_check_copybreak(struct net_device *netdev,
+ struct e1000_buffer *buffer_info,
+ u32 length, struct sk_buff **skb)
+{
+ struct sk_buff *new_skb;
+
+ if (length > copybreak)
+ return;
+
+ new_skb = netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(netdev, length);
+ if (!new_skb)
+ return;
+
+ skb_copy_to_linear_data_offset(new_skb, -NET_IP_ALIGN,
+ (*skb)->data - NET_IP_ALIGN,
+ length + NET_IP_ALIGN);
+ /* save the skb in buffer_info as good */
+ buffer_info->skb = *skb;
+ *skb = new_skb;
+}
+
/**
* e1000_clean_rx_irq - Send received data up the network stack; legacy
* @adapter: board private structure
@@ -3871,26 +3896,8 @@ static bool e1000_clean_rx_irq(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
total_rx_bytes += length;
total_rx_packets++;
- /* code added for copybreak, this should improve
- * performance for small packets with large amounts
- * of reassembly being done in the stack */
- if (length < copybreak) {
- struct sk_buff *new_skb =
- netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(netdev, length);
- if (new_skb) {
- skb_copy_to_linear_data_offset(new_skb,
- -NET_IP_ALIGN,
- (skb->data -
- NET_IP_ALIGN),
- (length +
- NET_IP_ALIGN));
- /* save the skb in buffer_info as good */
- buffer_info->skb = skb;
- skb = new_skb;
- }
- /* else just continue with the old one */
- }
- /* end copybreak code */
+ e1000_check_copybreak(netdev, buffer_info, length, &skb);
+
skb_put(skb, length);
/* Receive Checksum Offload */
diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgb/ixgb_main.c b/drivers/net/ixgb/ixgb_main.c
index d58ca6b..c6b75c8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ixgb/ixgb_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ixgb/ixgb_main.c
@@ -1921,6 +1921,31 @@ ixgb_rx_checksum(struct ixgb_adapter *adapter,
}
}
+/*
+ * this should improve performance for small packets with large amounts
+ * of reassembly being done in the stack
+ */
+static void ixgb_check_copybreak(struct net_device *netdev,
+ struct ixgb_buffer *buffer_info,
+ u32 length, struct sk_buff **skb)
+{
+ struct sk_buff *new_skb;
+
+ if (length > copybreak)
+ return;
+
+ new_skb = netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(netdev, length);
+ if (!new_skb)
+ return;
+
+ skb_copy_to_linear_data_offset(new_skb, -NET_IP_ALIGN,
+ (*skb)->data - NET_IP_ALIGN,
+ length + NET_IP_ALIGN);
+ /* save the skb in buffer_info as good */
+ buffer_info->skb = *skb;
+ *skb = new_skb;
+}
+
/**
* ixgb_clean_rx_irq - Send received data up the network stack,
* @adapter: board private structure
@@ -1957,11 +1982,14 @@ ixgb_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgb_adapter *adapter, int *work_done, int work_to_do)
prefetch(skb->data - NET_IP_ALIGN);
- if (++i == rx_ring->count) i = 0;
+ if (++i == rx_ring->count)
+ i = 0;
next_rxd = IXGB_RX_DESC(*rx_ring, i);
prefetch(next_rxd);
- if ((j = i + 1) == rx_ring->count) j = 0;
+ j = i + 1;
+ if (j == rx_ring->count)
+ j = 0;
next2_buffer = &rx_ring->buffer_info[j];
prefetch(next2_buffer);
@@ -1997,25 +2025,7 @@ ixgb_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgb_adapter *adapter, int *work_done, int work_to_do)
goto rxdesc_done;
}
- /* code added for copybreak, this should improve
- * performance for small packets with large amounts
- * of reassembly being done in the stack */
- if (length < copybreak) {
- struct sk_buff *new_skb =
- netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(netdev, length);
- if (new_skb) {
- skb_copy_to_linear_data_offset(new_skb,
- -NET_IP_ALIGN,
- (skb->data -
- NET_IP_ALIGN),
- (length +
- NET_IP_ALIGN));
- /* save the skb in buffer_info as good */
- buffer_info->skb = skb;
- skb = new_skb;
- }
- }
- /* end copybreak code */
+ ixgb_check_copybreak(netdev, buffer_info, length, &skb);
/* Good Receive */
skb_put(skb, length);
next reply other threads:[~2010-05-03 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-03 0:46 Joe Perches [this message]
2010-05-03 20:43 ` [PATCH] ixgb and e1000: Use new function for copybreak tests Jeff Kirsher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1272847591.30040.15.camel@Joe-Laptop.home \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.w.allan@intel.com \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=john.ronciak@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).