Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, hadi@cyberus.ca, therbert@google.com,
	monstr@monstr.eu, microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: Increase NET_SKB_PAD to 64 bytes
Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 07:15:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1273209321.2222.36.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100506.220221.90798296.davem@davemloft.net>

Le jeudi 06 mai 2010 à 22:02 -0700, David Miller a écrit :

> Seeing this made me go check who was overriding NET_IP_ALIGN or
> NET_SKB_PAD.
> 
> The powerpc bits are legitimate, but the microblaze case is complete
> bogosity.  It defines NET_IP_ALIGN to the default (2) and sets
> NET_SKB_PAD to L1_CACHE_BYTES which on microblaze is 4 and
> significantly smaller than the default.
> 
> So I'm going to delete them in net-next-2.6 like so:
> 
> --------------------
> microblaze: Kill NET_SKB_PAD and NET_IP_ALIGN overrides.
> 
> NET_IP_ALIGN defaults to 2, no need to override.
> 
> NET_SKB_PAD is now 64, which is much larger than microblaze's
> L1_CACHE_SIZE so no need to override that either.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> ---
>  arch/microblaze/include/asm/system.h |   10 ----------
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/system.h b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/system.h
> index 48c4f03..b1e2f07 100644
> --- a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/system.h
> +++ b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/system.h
> @@ -97,14 +97,4 @@ extern struct dentry *of_debugfs_root;
>  
>  #define arch_align_stack(x) (x)
>  
> -/*
> - * MicroBlaze doesn't handle unaligned accesses in hardware.
> - *
> - * Based on this we force the IP header alignment in network drivers.
> - * We also modify NET_SKB_PAD to be a cacheline in size, thus maintaining
> - * cacheline alignment of buffers.
> - */
> -#define NET_IP_ALIGN	2
> -#define NET_SKB_PAD	L1_CACHE_BYTES
> -
>  #endif /* _ASM_MICROBLAZE_SYSTEM_H */

Yes, this seems strange it actually worked if L1_CACHE_BYTES = 4

Thanks



  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-07  5:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-05  5:24 [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: Increase NET_SKB_PAD to 64 bytes Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07  5:02 ` David Miller
2010-05-07  5:15   ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-05-07  5:28     ` [microblaze-uclinux] " John Williams
2010-05-07  6:29       ` David Miller
2010-05-07  7:53     ` Michal Simek
2010-05-07  8:32       ` David Miller
2010-05-07  9:02         ` Michal Simek
2010-05-07  9:48         ` Michal Simek
2010-05-07  9:55           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07 10:09             ` Michal Simek
2010-05-07 10:27               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07  9:56           ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1273209321.2222.36.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au \
    --cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=therbert@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox