public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Bijay Singh <Bijay.Singh@guavus.com>
Cc: "Stephen Hemminger" <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
	"David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"<bhaskie@gmail.com>" <bhaskie@gmail.com>,
	"<bhutchings@solarflare.com>" <bhutchings@solarflare.com>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: TCP-MD5 checksum failure on x86_64 SMP
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 22:50:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1273611036.2512.18.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AAFABD0F-C66F-44C2-8BDC-FB489EA8655F@guavus.com>

Le mardi 11 mai 2010 à 04:08 +0000, Bijay Singh a écrit :
> Hi Eric,
> 
> I guess that makes me the enviable one. So I am keen to test out this feature completely, as long as I know what to do as a next step, directions, patches.
> 
> Thanks


I believe third problem comes from commit 4957faad
(TCPCT part 1g: Responder Cookie => Initiator), from William Allen
Simpson.

When a SYN-ACK packet is built (in tcp_synack_options()),
it specifically forbids a TIMESTAMP option to be included if SACK is
also selected :

doing_ts &= !ireq->sack_ok;

Problem is this mask is done on a local variable. socket is still marked
as being timestamp enabled.


Later, when we build tcp options for data packets, we _include_ a
timestamp, while our SYNACK didnt mention the option.  

So the following trafic can happen (and fails) :

18:38:29.041966 IP 192.168.0.33.58906 > 192.168.0.56.22226: Flags [S], seq 4014064674, win 8860, options [mss 4430,sackOK,TS val 519041 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7,nop,nop,md5can't check - 9b44126367effcf3247fcbf6da76b24d], length 0
18:38:29.042072 IP 192.168.0.56.22226 > 192.168.0.33.58906: Flags [S.], seq 586328714, ack 4014064675, win 5792, options [nop,nop,md5can't check - badd847799ded46f39642c341cc7e92b,mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0
18:38:29.042093 IP 192.168.0.33.58906 > 192.168.0.56.22226: Flags [.], ack 1, win 70, options [nop,nop,md5can't check - 3994ef6987df02a592963fba04c5d313], length 0
18:38:29.043217 IP 192.168.0.33.58906 > 192.168.0.56.22226: Flags [.], seq 1:1441, ack 1, win 70, options [nop,nop,md5can't check - 8399f7ccab3a6b8c5a3027ed58bba314], length 1440
18:38:29.043226 IP 192.168.0.33.58906 > 192.168.0.56.22226: Flags [P.], seq 1441:2501, ack 1, win 70, options [nop,nop,md5can't check - 701ebf65b1894a6bed4cefbf7a56596a], length 1060
18:38:29.043374 IP 192.168.0.56.22226 > 192.168.0.33.58906: Flags [.], ack 1441, win 68, options [nop,nop,md5can't check - 1badb315ba436ab59bff5b37daa871be,nop,nop,TS val 113051377 ecr 519041], length 0
18:38:29.043383 IP 192.168.0.56.22226 > 192.168.0.33.58906: Flags [.], ack 2501, win 91, options [nop,nop,md5can't check - 120564dcb99f822f3b70910282a6ed9d,nop,nop,TS val 113051377 ecr 519041], length 0
18:38:29.043673 IP 192.168.0.56.22226 > 192.168.0.33.58906: Flags [.], seq 1:1429, ack 2501, win 91, options [nop,nop,md5can't check - fe5dfb438065373b52ba85bf800876a8,nop,nop,TS val 113051377 ecr 519041], length 1428
18:38:29.043681 IP 192.168.0.56.22226 > 192.168.0.33.58906: Flags [P.], seq 1429:2500, ack 2501, win 91, options [nop,nop,md5can't check - 7a910cd5ff357bf0e2c8d3489aafaa86,nop,nop,TS val 113051377 ecr 519041], length 1071
18:38:32.037786 IP 192.168.0.56.22226 > 192.168.0.33.58906: Flags [.], seq 1:1429, ack 2501, win 91, options [nop,nop,md5can't check - fe5dfb438065373b52ba85bf800876a8,nop,nop,TS val 113051677 ecr 519041], length 1428
18:38:38.037708 IP 192.168.0.56.22226 > 192.168.0.33.58906: Flags [.], seq 1:1429, ack 2501, win 91, options [nop,nop,md5can't check - fe5dfb438065373b52ba85bf800876a8,nop,nop,TS val 113052277 ecr 519041], length 1428
18:38:50.037524 IP 192.168.0.56.22226 > 192.168.0.33.58906: Flags [.], seq 1:1429, ack 2501, win 91, options [nop,nop,md5can't check - fe5dfb438065373b52ba85bf800876a8,nop,nop,TS val 113053477 ecr 519041], length 1428


Could you try following patch ?

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
index 5db3a2c..0be21cd 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -668,7 +668,7 @@ static unsigned tcp_synack_options(struct sock *sk,
 	u8 cookie_plus = (xvp != NULL && !xvp->cookie_out_never) ?
 			 xvp->cookie_plus :
 			 0;
-	bool doing_ts = ireq->tstamp_ok;
+	bool doing_ts;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_TCP_MD5SIG
 	*md5 = tcp_rsk(req)->af_specific->md5_lookup(sk, req);
@@ -681,11 +681,12 @@ static unsigned tcp_synack_options(struct sock *sk,
 		 * rather than TS in order to fit in better with old,
 		 * buggy kernels, but that was deemed to be unnecessary.
 		 */
-		doing_ts &= !ireq->sack_ok;
+		ireq->tstamp_ok &= !ireq->sack_ok;
 	}
 #else
 	*md5 = NULL;
 #endif
+	doing_ts = ireq->tstamp_ok;
 
 	/* We always send an MSS option. */
 	opts->mss = mss;






  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-05-11 20:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <i2h571fb4001005031027y4a58c4dtfd28ddcdc08d8401@mail.gmail.com>
2010-05-04  3:30 ` TCP-MD5 checksum failure on x86_64 SMP Bhaskar Dutta
2010-05-04 11:32   ` Ben Hutchings
2010-05-04 14:28     ` Bhaskar Dutta
2010-05-04 16:12       ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-04 17:08         ` Bhaskar Dutta
2010-05-04 17:13           ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-05 18:03             ` Bhaskar Dutta
2010-05-05 18:53               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-06 11:55                 ` Bhaskar Dutta
2010-05-06 12:06                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07  5:04                     ` David Miller
2010-05-07  5:32                       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07 17:14                         ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-07 17:21                           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07 17:36                             ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-07 21:40                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-10 14:55                                 ` Bijay Singh
2010-05-10 15:18                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-10 17:27                                     ` Bijay Singh
2010-05-11  4:08                                     ` Bijay Singh
2010-05-11  6:27                                       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-11  8:23                                         ` Bijay Singh
2010-05-11 20:50                                       ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-05-12  3:20                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-12 22:22                                           ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-12 22:24                                             ` David Miller
2010-05-16 19:53                                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-16 20:48                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-17  3:49                                           ` Bijay Singh
2010-05-17  5:03                                             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-17 17:22                                               ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-17 20:42                                               ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-17 21:04                                                 ` [PATCH] tcp: tcp_synack_options() fix Eric Dumazet
2010-05-18  5:35                                                   ` David Miller
2010-05-16  7:30                               ` TCP-MD5 checksum failure on x86_64 SMP David Miller
2010-05-07  8:46                     ` Lars Eggert
2010-05-07  8:55                       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07  9:12                       ` David Miller
2010-05-07  5:39                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07  8:00                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07  8:59                       ` Bhaskar Dutta
2010-05-07  9:37                         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07 10:50                           ` Bhaskar Dutta
2010-05-07 15:18                             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07 15:44                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07 21:18                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-16  7:37                                   ` David Miller
2010-05-16  7:35                       ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1273611036.2512.18.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=Bijay.Singh@guavus.com \
    --cc=bhaskie@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox