From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: avoid one atomic op per cloned skb
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 07:18:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1274246338.2485.38.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1274209124.8274.41.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Le mardi 18 mai 2010 à 20:58 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Oops, it needs more thinking, definitely not a 2.6.35 thing...
>
> There would be a race between skb_clone() and kfree_skbmem()
>
> kfree_skbmem() must perform the atomic_dec_and_test() before setting
> skb->fclone to SKB_FCLONE_UNAVAILABLE.
>
> Doing so avoids dirtying skb->fclone right before kmem_cache_free()...
>
>
> V2 would be :
>
> [RFC v2] net: avoid one atomic op per cloned skb
>
> skb_clone() can use atomic_set(clone_ref, 2) safely, because only
> current thread can possibly touch clone_ref at this point.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> index c543dd2..77d5a6b 100644
> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> @@ -370,13 +370,13 @@ static void kfree_skbmem(struct sk_buff *skb)
> fclone_ref = (atomic_t *) (skb + 1);
> other = skb - 1;
>
> - /* The clone portion is available for
> - * fast-cloning again.
> - */
> - skb->fclone = SKB_FCLONE_UNAVAILABLE;
> -
> if (atomic_dec_and_test(fclone_ref))
> kmem_cache_free(skbuff_fclone_cache, other);
> + else
> + /* The clone portion is available for fast-cloning.
> + * Note this must be done after the fclone_ref change.
> + */
> + skb->fclone = SKB_FCLONE_UNAVAILABLE;
This still is racy, because we are not allowed to access skb after the
atomic_dec_and_test() :
Other thread can now go past the final refcount decrement and free skb
under us.
Hmm...
> break;
> }
> }
> @@ -628,7 +628,7 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_clone(struct sk_buff *skb, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> n->fclone == SKB_FCLONE_UNAVAILABLE) {
> atomic_t *fclone_ref = (atomic_t *) (n + 1);
> n->fclone = SKB_FCLONE_CLONE;
> - atomic_inc(fclone_ref);
> + atomic_set(fclone_ref, 2);
> } else {
> n = kmem_cache_alloc(skbuff_head_cache, gfp_mask);
> if (!n)
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-19 5:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-18 13:40 [PATCH] net: avoid one atomic op per cloned skb Eric Dumazet
2010-05-18 18:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-19 5:18 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1274246338.2485.38.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox