public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
Cc: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: fix problem in dequeuing from input_pkt_queue
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 06:37:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1274330246.2658.16.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimv8YJD61uADUrHoeL4xGfE8wPPUwVpwJNZPFpu@mail.gmail.com>

Le mercredi 19 mai 2010 à 19:48 -0700, Tom Herbert a écrit :
> >> It should be okay?  process_backlog only runs in softirq so bottom
> >> halves are already disabled, and I don't think flush_backlog runs out
> >> of an interrupt.
> >>
> >
> > Oh no. It is an IRQ handler.
> >
> Very well, I will fix that.
> 
> Now I'm wondering, though, what the purpose of flush_backlog is...
> since __netif_receive_skb is called with interrupts enabled it's
> obvious flush_backlog won't catch all the skb's that reference the
> device go away.  Is there a reason these packets need to be flushed
> and can't just be processed?

flush_backlog is called when device is dismantled.

No new packets should be generated by the device at this moment.

Could you please split your patch in units, I spent 20 minutes to review
it and come to same conclusion than Changli (need to disable interrupts
as they are currently disabled) and also :

input_queue_head_incr(sd); are _not_ needed in flush_backlog()

We are in the very last moments of the life of the device, in a very
unlikely situation (packets in flight, not already consumed by the cpu),
we are _dropping_ packets, so OOO means nothing at this point. 

In dev_cpu_callback(), you reverse the order of input_pkt_queue /
process_queue.

Thats fine, but should be a single patch, because I am not sure the
input_queue_head_incr() are valid here, since we re-inject these packets
to netif_rx(). Could you clarify this point ?

Thanks !



  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-20  4:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-19 21:47 [PATCH] net: fix problem in dequeuing from input_pkt_queue Tom Herbert
2010-05-19 23:45 ` Changli Gao
2010-05-19 23:58   ` Tom Herbert
2010-05-20  0:09     ` Changli Gao
2010-05-20  2:48       ` Tom Herbert
2010-05-20  4:37         ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-05-20  6:05           ` Tom Herbert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1274330246.2658.16.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=therbert@google.com \
    --cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox