public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Ivan Novick <novickivan@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Tim Heath <theath@greenplum.com>
Subject: Re: Choppy TCP send performance
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 23:16:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1275081377.2472.13.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilSrX5PifVHlxMjTK-wo_viD8IS_1m1k-vPOlE3@mail.gmail.com>

Le vendredi 28 mai 2010 à 13:38 -0700, Ivan Novick a écrit :
> Hello,
> 
> I am using RHEL5 and have 1 Gigabit NIC cards.
> 
> When doing a loop sending 128 KB blocks of data using TCP.  I am using
> system tap to debug the performance and finding that:
> 
> 90% of the send calls take about 100 micro seconds and 10% of the send
> calls take about 10 miliseconds.  The average send time is about 1
> milisecond
> 
> The 10% of the calls taking about 10 milliseconds seem to be
> correlated with "sk_stream_wait_memory" calls in the kernel.
> 
> sk_stream_wait_memory seems to be called when the send buffer is full
> and the next send call does not complete until the send buffer
> utilization goes down from 4,194,304 bytes to 2,814,968 bytes.
> 
> This implies that the send that blocks on a full send buffer will not
> complete until there is 1 meg of free space in the send buffer even
> though the send could be accepted into the OS with only 128KB of free
> space.
> 
> Do you think I am misinterpreting this data or is there a way to even
> out the send calls so that they they are more even in duration: approx
> 1 milisecond per call.  Is there a parameter to reduce how much space
> needs to be free in the send buffer before a blocking send call can
> complete from user space?

static void sock_def_write_space(struct sock *sk)
{
...
if ((atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc) << 1) <= sk->sk_sndbuf) {
...


Quick answer is : No, this is not tunable ( independantly than SNDBUF )

SO_SNDLOWAT is not implemented on linux, yet (its value is : 1).


Why would you want to wakeup your thread more than necessary ?




  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-28 21:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-28 20:38 Choppy TCP send performance Ivan Novick
2010-05-28 21:16 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-05-28 21:35   ` Ivan Novick
2010-05-28 22:00     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-28 22:23       ` Ivan Novick
2010-05-28 22:08     ` Rick Jones
2010-05-28 22:28       ` Ivan Novick
2010-05-28 22:57         ` Rick Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1275081377.2472.13.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=novickivan@gmail.com \
    --cc=theath@greenplum.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox