public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
	"Pekka Savola (ipv6)" <pekkas@netcore.fi>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH] net/ipv6: Use GFP_ATOMIC when a lock is held
Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 23:18:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1275254298.2472.26.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005302303180.19253@ask.diku.dk>

Le dimanche 30 mai 2010 à 23:09 +0200, Julia Lawall a écrit :

> could exit with success without the kzalloc ever being called.  If the 
> kzalloc is moved up, it could fail and then it returns immediately without 
> executing the loop.  A solution could be to leave the NULL test on p where 
> it is, and only move up the kzalloc.  Or perhaps the change in behavior 
> doesn't matter?

If a GFP_KERNEL allocation fails, we are in a big trouble anyway :)

GFP_ATOMIC are more problematic in this area :)

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-30 21:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-30 19:48 Subject: [PATCH] net/ipv6: Use GFP_ATOMIC when a lock is held Julia Lawall
2010-05-30 20:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-30 20:50   ` Julia Lawall
2010-05-30 20:55     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-30 21:09       ` Julia Lawall
2010-05-30 21:18         ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-05-31  5:04         ` [PATCH] ipv6: get rid of ipip6_prl_lock Eric Dumazet
2010-06-01  7:27           ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1275254298.2472.26.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=julia@diku.dk \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pekkas@netcore.fi \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox